Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />August 29, 1985 <br />Page 9 <br />22) Section 8-40~: <br />Citizen input indicates that the 12 month limitation on <br />C conditional use permits is too short and should be lengthened <br />to 3 to 5 years. <br />Staff recommendation is to leave this section as is. <br />23) Section 8-404 (B): <br />Citizen comment indicates that a minor change in a major or <br />minor development site plan should not require resubmission of <br />a new general plan. <br />Recommended that this section be left as is but perhaps, make a <br />clear reference to the Development Ordinance sections that <br />apply. <br />Chairman Wilson made a motion that we reach a consensus on the <br />adoption of the recommendations made for Sections 8-200, 8-402 <br />• (8), 8-402 (10), 8-403 and 8-404 (B). Motion by Mr. Blackwell <br />~d Seconded by Janet Graves. Motion carried with no <br />opposition. <br />24) Section 10-101 (4): <br />This citizen input deals with construction schedules for <br />multistage planned unit developments. Staff feels the word <br />C "approximate" should be included before the starting date and <br />completion date. <br />25) Section 10-101 6 (C): <br />Citizen input indicates that the term "sufficient amount of <br />usuable open space" is somewhat vague. In the P.U.D. <br />situation, flexibility has to happen and must be in general <br />compliance per Mr. Paulissen. Any amendment to this section <br />would remove flexibility. <br />26) Section 10-102 (e): <br />Citizen comment indicates that there is no need for the review <br />of deed restrictions by the City Attorney to insure that they <br />comply with F.H.A. Deed Restrictions. Staff recommends that <br />• <br />