My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-29-1985 Regular Called Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1980's
>
1985
>
08-29-1985 Regular Called Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:38 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:52:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/29/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- • • <br />C7 <br />Minutes of Planning & Zoning Commission <br />August 29, 1985 <br />Page 4 <br />C question was concerning definition on Ranch Trailer. John <br />Armstrong indicated that the truck route ordinance has the word <br />for word definition in commentary. <br />After this discussion, Chairman Wilson said since the motion <br />was seconded, all in favor, signify by saying "Aye", all <br />opposed, Motion carried adopting definitions. <br />Chairman Wilson suggested Commission begin with Section 2. <br />6) Section 2-703 <br />Staff's decision on this was to Change Section 2-703 of the <br />proposed ordinance to read as contained in Section 9-105 of <br />current Ordinance 780 since developers were pleased with the <br />way to current ordinance read. <br />7) Section 2-800 <br />• Staff recommended that no change be made in this section of the <br />proposed zoning ordinance. <br />Chairman Wilson entertained a motion be made on Section 2. <br />Motion made by Janet Graves, Seconded ~ Bobbv Blackwell. <br />There was no opposition, the motion carried. <br />C Chairman Wilson asked that we move to Section 4. <br />8) Section 4-10~ <br />This section deals with a through-lot situation. Unclear to <br />citizens in its wording. The 20-foot is to apply to a rear <br />setback in the case of a through lot situation in a residential <br />district. <br />9) Section 4-104 <br />Citizen comment was to remove setbacks in the case of <br />commercial developments. When compared to Comprehensive Plan, <br />staff recommended that there be no change to this section. <br />Chairman Wilson indicated that setbacks were a vitally <br />important part of any type of comprehensive plan or plan. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.