Laserfiche WebLink
Planeview Subdivis~n Final Plat Review Lette~Page 2 <br />• ~~~®N[MENDATION: Pleasure of the Commission. <br />5. Side lot lines should be radial to the curved street line <br />(5.03). <br />COMMENTARY: Lot 6 of Block 1 and Lots 4 and 5 of Block do <br />not conform to this requirement. <br />REC®MMENDATION: Grant variance for Item 5 under 1~04D_ <br />6. Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 2 have double frontage (®~ tw® <br />streets) and do not back on a mayor thoroughfare C~.®~a <br />COMMENTARY: The Thoroughfare Plan approved by the Commission <br />does not designate North "H" street a major thoroughfare. <br />5.03 prohibits double front lots on such streets. However, a <br />note on the plat prohibits driveway access to all lots <br />backing on North "H". <br />REO®MMENDATION: Grant variance for Item 6 under 13.04D <br />ppovided plat note is changed to reflect "Lots ad~acent__to <br />North H Street are hereby denied driveway access to North N <br />Street." <br />7. Building setback lines for Lot 1 of Block 1 and Lots 1, 8, <br />• aid 9 of Block 2 should be 15' instead of 10~ at the exterior <br />side lot line (5.04) <br />COMMENTARY: A House has been built on Lot 1 of Block 1 which <br />has been setback nearly 25 feet from the exterior side lot <br />line. The other three lots are vacant <br />RECOMI4ENDATION: Require conformance <br />8. One control monument should be shown on the Final Pls~t <br />(6.01A). <br />COMMENTARY: The Public Improvements Criteria Manual, which <br />will specify how control monuments are to be installed has <br />not yet been published. <br />REC®MMENDATION: Grant variance for Item 8 under 13.04D. <br />9. Plat filing fee of $50.00 has not been paid (10.00) <br />COMMENTARY: The developer's engineer has stated that these <br />fees were paid to Lomax. <br />REO®MMENDATION: Grant variance for Item~9 per 13.04D. <br />• <br />