My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
01-16-1986 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1980's
>
1986
>
01-16-1986 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 2:52:35 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:53:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/16/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />CITY OF LA PORTE • <br />• <br />• <br />TO: CITY A PORTE <br />FROM: D LISSEN <br />DATE: 01/10/86 <br />INTER -OFFICE MEMO <br />PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <br />SUBJECT: REZONING-B.A.N.C. Leasing-13.7143 Acres out of W. Jones <br />Survey a-482 <br />The City has received a request to rezone 13.7143 Acres out of the W. <br />Jones Survey A-482. The request asks for a re -zoning to a high <br />density residential zone. The request is to allow a density of 50 <br />dwelling units per acre (D.U.A.) and allow units varying in size from <br />100 to 500 SF per unit. <br />There are several items contained in this request that do not fall <br />within the parameters of a rezoning. As the ordinance is now written <br />a rezoning could not be granted without the creation of a high density <br />residential zone. <br />This request contains several items that are in direct conflict with <br />the terms of the existing zoning ordinance. These items are (1) unit <br />size is too small, ie. 100 SF instead of the 500 SF required in the <br />current ordinance, (2) Dwelling units per acres is nearly twice the <br />current limit, ie. 50 D.U.A. instead of the current 27 D.U.A. <br />By reading between the lines it appears that this project would be <br />ideally suited to P.U.D. development. The mixed uses indicated would <br />lend themselves well to this type of development. <br />Based on the facts discussed above and the requirements of the current <br />zoning ordinance, staff must recommend that this request be denied for <br />the following reasons; <br />( 1 ) Lack of a high densii; / r Esidential zone <br />(2) Non-conformance to the required 27 D.U.A. <br />(3) Non-conformance with the minimum dwelling unit size <br />The developer would be encouraged to discuss the project with the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission if he decides to pursue this project in <br />order to map out a possible path for development. The developer may <br />chose to hold or re -submit this request under the terms of the new <br />zoning ordinance. Please note that even under the terms of proposed <br />ordinance the density is substantially higher than the 27 D.U.A. <br />proposed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.