My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-22-1987 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1980's
>
1987
>
10-22-1987 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:38 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:53:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/22/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Planning & Zoning Minutes <br />October 22, 1987 <br />Page 2 <br />The second area for discussion was acreage at the Intersection of <br />Fairmont Parkway and Underwood, approximately 18.05 acres; see <br />reference attached. There is a Neighborhood Commercial Zone presently <br />at that corner and property owners are asking that the entire strip be <br />zoned as N.C. <br />The final area is located at Fairmont Parkway and Canada in Outlot 712, <br />property owner is asking that it be zoned as N.C. <br />The Commission has decided that Block 93 and acreage at the <br />intersection of Fairmont Parkway and Underwood be considered for map <br />review. <br />There was lengthy discussion on the property at Fairmont and Canada. <br />Mr. Dick Gregg, attorney for Mr. Millar, stated that supposedly a <br />member of Council the night the map was adopted, made a motion for the <br />Tract to be flagged as a map review and not a rezoning, there was a <br />second made and the motion was carried. <br />Mark Lewis said the written Council minutes did not reflect this <br />motion. He will review the original tape of that meeting and if <br />Council did give permission, the Commission will abide by it. If there <br />is no such motion on the tape, the Commission will treat this as a <br />rezoning. This issue could be addressed at the next Public Hearing on <br />November 19, 1887 <br />There was a motion by Inge Browder and a second by Charles Boyle to set <br />the Public Hearing on Alovember 19, 1987. The vote was unanimous and <br />the motion carried. <br />Mlark read through each section of the Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance <br />No. 1501. <br />Section 10 - 1011 Prohibited Signs <br />Staff discussed such signs as Garage Sale signs, elevated <br />signs that must be as far off the property line as its <br />heigth, billboards, signs that may be several miles away <br />from the business - will this decrease revenues? <br />Knox Askins noted that the purpose of the Ordinance is not to <br />prohibit all signs, only to make the signs neater and our city <br />more attractive. <br />There was a motion by Jack Gresham and a second by Lola Phillips <br />• to include this ordinance in the Public Hearing on November 19, <br />1987. There was no discussion and the vote was 3-2, motion <br />carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.