My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-19-1990 Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1990
>
07-19-1990 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:37 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:53:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/19/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />• Planning & Zoning Meeting <br />Minutes of 7-19-90 <br />Page2of4 <br />SPEAKERS: <br />Jim I.ongnecker - He said he was supporting Mr. Dennis Dunham on his views of <br />the sign ordinance relating to portable signs (on/off premise). <br />Dennis Dunham - Mr. Dunham stated...as before he did not want to mislead anyone <br />about this portable sign business...it's not only portable signs, the issue here is <br />limiting a businessman in the City of La Porte from advertising his services or <br />products off his premises...whether it be a stationary sign, portable sign, upside- <br />down sign, what ever it is...if we can let national companies come into La Porte, <br />Texas and advertise, who don't pay taxes, why can't our own business people <br />advertise off-premises...you made no recommendations or no effort to have some <br />kind of thing in there so a person could advertise off his property, but you let other <br />people. We just ask that you give the La Porte business people consideration for off- <br />premise advertising as you do other business. Mr. Dunham stated ...he felt there <br />needed to be some clarification in this ordinance, because you allow a public service <br />sign, but in the same spot when I put my name on it, according to the ordinance, it <br />upsets the aesthetic value, when I don't put my name on it, the sign can remain there <br />S and it's ok, if it meets the rest of the criteria of the ordinance. <br />Mrs. Graves declared the floor open for discussion on. the sign issue and reminded <br />the Commission to keep in mind that we are considering whether or not to <br />recommend to Council that the review is needed. Mr. Charlie Boyle stated that he <br />that would like for the Commission to review it and he felt that the off-premise signs <br />could be allowed with limitations. Mr. Edmonds asked if the portable signs were the <br />main issue and Mrs. Graves said this was the main item. Mrs. Browder said she <br />thought that Mr. Dunham was referring to any type of off-premise signs, not just <br />portable signs. <br />Mrs. Graves stated that the ordinance does allow off-premise and portable signs in <br />Light/Heavy Industrial and there are some of those areas that front major <br />thoroughfares. These can be either portable or fixed signs. <br />After further discussion a motion was made by Charlie Boyle to review portable and <br />off-premise portable signs and have it for September when the review of Ordinance <br />No. 1501 will start, Jack Gresham second the motion, Eugene Edmonds, Inge <br />Browder in favor with Janet Graves against. Motion passed. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.