My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
03-21-1991 Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1991
>
03-21-1991 Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:37 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:53:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/21/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1991 ANNUAL REVIEW OF <br />ZONING ORDINANCE '1501 <br />DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Section 6-400. Table B: Residential (pgs 29-31): <br /> <br />Footnotes #3 of Section 5-700 states: "The minimum setback <br />adjacent to any utility easement shall be three feet (3')." The <br />intent of this footnote is to maintain a minimum setback between <br />primary structures and utility easements commonly located in rear- <br />yards of La Porte's subdivisions. Many of the same subdivisions <br />also have smaller, "single use" utility easements which are located <br />in side yards. Prior to the adoption of Ordinance 1501, these <br />easements were often used to provide required sideyard setbacks. <br />A strict reading of footnote #3 would require a setback of three <br />feet to be maintained from these easements. <br /> <br />In January of 1990, Fairmont Park Joint Venture appealed this <br />Ordinance interpretation. The Zoning Board of Adjustment granted <br />the appeal. Staff has complied with the Board's decision in the <br />review and approval of all subsequent building permit applications. <br /> <br />The Commission is being asked to review this section and <br />consider amending it as follows: (Changes are underlined). <br /> <br />3. The minimum setback adjacent to any utility easement <br />located in a rear yard. shall be three feet (3'). <br />No portion of any building including projections of <br />any nature shall encroach into any utility easement <br />or vertical projection of the easement boundary. <br /> <br />Should it be determined that the intent of the Ordinance is <br />to require the additional setback adjacent to side-yard easements, <br />footnote #3 can be left in its present form. <br /> <br />II. Section 6-400. Table A. Commercial (pgs 37-40): <br /> <br />Consideration of two General Commercial Use listings is being <br />requested. The first of these listings is S.l.C. #0752. This <br />listing, which includes boarding and breeding kennels, has been <br />designated as a Conditional, General Commercial Use. This <br />designation was made in conjunction with the adoption of City'S <br />Kennel Ordinance (#1559). While the Conditional designation is <br />appropriate for kennels and most of the other activities covered <br />by this S.l.C. listing, one specific activity, "dog grooming" would <br />seem to be an appropriate permitted General Commercial Use. A way <br />to achieve this end would be by the creation of the following new <br />listing: <br /> <br />NC <br /> <br />GC <br /> <br />Dog Grooming without <br />overnight Boarding <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.