Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting <br />• Minutes of 3-21-91 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />VI. SECTION 7-600. INDUSTRIAL TABLE B: <br />This section regulates setbacks within Industrial Zones. The Commission has been <br />required to consider amending the setback provisions of this Table as they apply to <br />Business Industrial uses. The current setback requirements are as follows: <br />Front - 50 feet; Rear - 40 feet; Side - 30 feet <br />Requested setbacks are as follows: <br />Front - 30 feet; Rear - 15 feet; Side - 15 feet. <br />In considering this request, it is necessary to examine the intent of the <br />Comprehensive Plan as it applies to Business Industrial use zones. In developing the <br />Comprehensive Plan, public hearing input and citizen surveys revealed that a primary <br />desire of La Porte's resident citizens is for an improved residential environment. <br />One of the steps necessary for protecting and upgrading neighborhoods is "buffering" <br />between residential and industrial areas. Another function of Business Industrial <br />setback relates to the types of uses permitted in BI zones. The majority of BI uses <br />involve some aspect of warehousing and therefore some degree of heavy truck traffic. <br />Business Industrial setback areas are intended to be utilized for truck parking and <br />maneuvering. <br />In summation, the thrust of this argument is as follows. In order to accommodate <br />the on-site parking, loading dock and maneuvering requirements of the Zoning <br />Ordinance, setbacks comparable to those presently in effect would be necessary on <br />most tracts of property. The alternative would be "congestion of the public right- <br />of-way" which the Ordinance seeks to avoid. So finally, the question returned to <br />once again is this, "would 15 feet side and rear Business Industrial setbacks provide <br />an adequate buffer between areas of industrial and residential development? Also <br />would these setbacks allow for adequate on site manuvering? <br />After lengthy discussion and comments from Mr. Mark McKim (making the setback <br />change request) the Commission tabled the item for more discussion and research. <br />The next workshop was set for April 18, 1991 at 6:00 PM. <br />• <br />