Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes of April 18, 1991 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />The Commission after discussion had no problem with this new paragraph. <br /> <br />The next item discussed was Section 6-400, Table A, SIC 473 which is specifically <br />described as "Arrangement of Transportation of Freight and Cargo". The <br />Commission had proposed to move the entire listing out of General Commercial and <br />into the Industrial Tables. Concern was expressed that although this move would <br />help alleviate the truck problem, it would also completely bar transport related <br />businesses from the City's commercial districts. Staff was directed to explore the <br />possibility of moving the majority of SIC 473 Industrial Table A while "carving out" <br />certain activities to be retained as Permitted G.C. uses. <br /> <br />Staff suggested a scenario which would consist of first placing SIC 472 into a separate <br />listing and SIC 473 listed in the Commercial Table using the "Permitted with <br />Conditions" format. SIC 473 would also be listed as a permitted use in the Industrial <br />Tables, a new Performance Standard would be added to Section 6-501. This format <br />in conjunction with stricter Zoning Permit controls should provide an adequate <br />means of regulating this type of business activity. <br /> <br />The Commission after discussion had no problem with this change. <br /> <br />Staff, as directed by the Commission, further researched the issue of Business <br />Industrial (BI) setbacks. Specific Zoning Ordinance regulations with an emphasis <br />on the on-site parking and maneuvering of heavy trucks was reviewed. In <br />summation, the Business Industrial setbacks currently in place are an integral <br />component of the overall BI "concept". To amend setbacks independently of other <br />BI related ordinance requirements, could both ''water down" the intent of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and create conflicts within the ordinance that would make <br />interpretation and enforcement difficult. <br /> <br />After a lengthy discussion the Commission decided the current setbacks should stay <br />as they presently are and no change was made. <br /> <br />A review of Neighborhood Commercial regulations has been requested. Mrs. Waters <br />stated that the reason for this request was so that each member of the Commission <br />could make themselves familiar with this zoning regulation. Neighborhood <br />Commercial zones are small and generally surrounded by residentially zoned <br />property. <br /> <br />Staff would recommend a review of the following Zoning Ordinance sections: Section <br />6-201 Neighborhood Commercial Purpose and Section 6-400 Table A-Commercial. <br />The Commission requested the staff to study the Neighborhood Commercial areas <br />and bring a recommendation to them at the next meeting. <br /> <br />BREAK: <br /> <br />7:25 - 7:35 PM <br />