Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: The Planning and Zoning <br />Commission during the August 1, 1991 meeting, in conjunction with <br />members of the Main Street Association, established a set of <br />goals for the Main Street area. These goals, as staff <br />understands them, are as follows: <br /> <br />1) Make Main Street attractive to pedestrians. <br />2) Promote a mix of retail uses, offices and restaurants. <br />3) Elimination of uses that utilize outdoor storage and <br />outdoor service activities. <br />4) Preserve and enhance the character of La Porte's <br />Downtown District with an emphasis on promoting an "old <br />town" feel. <br /> <br />The Commission next discussed possible boundaries for a <br />Downtown District. After considerable discussion, the Commission <br />decided to take an August 8 "walking tour" of the Main Street <br />area. Several possible boundaries for the Downtown District were <br />discussed at the August 8 meeting. Staff has prepared maps <br />illustrating the various boundary scenarios. These maps are <br />attached as exhibits. <br /> <br />With goals and boundaries established, the next issue to be <br />addressed is what types of zoning regulations are necessary for <br />furthering the stated goals. The best point from which to begin <br />this discussion is probably a discussion of "obstacles" which the <br />Zoning Ordinance currently poses to restoration and development <br />within the district. These obstacles appear to fall into three <br />basic categories. These are as follows: <br /> <br />1) General Commercial Uses: The range of uses allowable <br />in G. C. Zones is too broadly based in that they allow <br />a number of permitted G. C. uses and activities that <br />are not conducive to the goals for the District. <br /> <br />2) Density Intensity Issues: Current lot coverage and <br />setback limits prevent construction of new buildings <br />that are in keeping with "typical" Main Street <br />structures. They could prevent reconstruction of a <br />destroyed building or even prevent a renovation whose <br />cost exceeded 50% of the building market value. <br />