My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-05-1991 Regular Meeting of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1991
>
09-05-1991 Regular Meeting of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:37 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/5/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />SETBACK: In addition to setbacks, the related density <br />intensity issues of lot coverage and landscaping are all issues <br />which may be addressed through the Board of Adjustment's special <br />exception process. The various types of special exception which <br />could be available include exceptions to both front and rear <br />setbacks as well as exceptions for buildings located on corner <br />lots (Section 11-605.2.b). Additionally, Section 4-201.3 <br />empowers the Board of Adjustment to grant special exceptions to <br />allow substantial repair of structures that have deteriorated or <br />been damaged in excess of 50% of its fair market value. <br /> <br />All the Board of Adjustment options noted above are <br />currently available in the Zoning Ordinance and have been <br />utilized by Main Street property owners as well as people <br />throughout the City. The Zoning Ordinance charges the Board to <br />grant special exception relief only when it finds that such <br />special exception will not adversely affect the value and use of <br />adjacent or neighboring property or be contrary to the best <br />public interest (Section 11-605)." <br /> <br />The advantages offered by this approach include the <br />availability of this option without ordinance amendment as well <br />as increased oversight control of proposed projects. The <br />possible disadvantages include uncertainties regarding approval <br />(The Board approaches each case individually and does not <br />consider its previous decisions as precedents.) and the somewhat <br />cumbersome nature of the process. <br /> <br />An amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan identifying <br />and recognizing the special needs and goals of Main Street would <br />help deal with the uncertainty involved with Board of Adjustment <br />cases. Establishing goals and standards against which a-proposed <br />project can be evaluated, would give the Board clear guidelines <br />in making determinations. <br /> <br />There is currently a provision in the residential section of <br />the Zoning Ordinance which could be readily adapted to Commercial <br />applications. It deals with setback "averaging" and could help <br />reduce the need for Board of Adjustment hearings regarding Main <br />street construction projects. This provision, currently located <br />in Section 5-701 states: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.