My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-20-1997 Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1997
>
02-20-1997 Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:35 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:54:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/20/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes of Febmary 2A, 1997 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />property has held its current zoning for over 10 years. While he <br />does not claim to be an appraiser, Mr. Valentin noted that <br />residential property in the immediate area and across the street is <br />selling from X33,000 to $56,000 per lot. It is his belief that the <br />property in question has more worth as residential than <br />commercial. The expansion of the Bayport Channel, which <br />converted Old Hwy. 146 to a dead end street named South <br />Broadway, is no longer a thoroughfare. It is not a good climate <br />for a commercial businesses. Over 20 businesses have gone out <br />of business. Vacancies currently exist in three NC zones so it is <br />difficult to understand the need for creating additional NC zones. <br />And finally, Mr. Valentin noted that rezoning such a small area <br />would constitute spot zoning. Mr. Valentin requested the <br />property's zoning remain residential. <br />V. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING <br />Chairman Waters closed the Public Hearing at 6:32 PM. <br />Mr. Rankin reminded the applicant that he could continue to run his business as <br />usual without a rezoning, and additionally, if he wanted to sell, the business use (or a <br />like use) would be allowed for the new owner. <br />VI. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR ZONE <br />CHANGE REQUEST #R97-001. <br />A motion was made by Melton Wolters to deny Zone Change Request #R97-001. <br />The motion was seconded by Howard Ebow. All were in favor and the motion <br />passed. <br />(Note: Even though the applicant visited with staff prior to the meeting to request <br />the zone change be to General Commercial rather than Neighborhood Commercial, <br />the original request was for Neighborhood Commercial. This is how it was noticed <br />to the public and appeared on the agenda for consideration by the Commission. <br />VII. PRESENTATION BY DEVELOPER FOR PROPOSED TEXAS <br />IMPORT/EXPORT INDUSTRIAL PARE. <br />Mr. Rankin stated that approximately 3-4 months ago, City staff was contacted by <br />Developers expressing an interest in building a large development of over 250 acres <br />within the city limits. IVfr. Rankin noted that at this early stage, staff neither approves <br />nor disapproves of the development. He introduced the first speaker for the group <br />as Doyle Toups with the Grubb & Ellis Company. <br />Mr. Toups provided the following information: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.