My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-20-1997 Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1997
>
02-20-1997 Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:35 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:54:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/20/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes of February ZA,1997 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />material response plan in place. He would anticipate the same type of program here. <br />There will also be mechanical personnel on staff to repair the cars. <br />Howard Ebow asked if the projected 1,800 jobs were permanent. Mr. Truitt said <br />that number related to the total project. The rail component of the development <br />would account for approximately 200 permanent jobs after construction. <br />Chuck Engelken asked about the salary range of the 200 jobs. Mr. Lagen answered <br />that they offer a very competitive wage. In addition, they offer a very positive <br />benefit package. <br />Melton Wolters asked about storm drainage. Mr. Truitt stated there would be <br />stormwater detention that would be monitored and treated on site if necessary. Mr. <br />Wolters noted that ship channel industries may currently be staging their cars on the <br />north side of Fairmont Parkway, but when they learn there is a facility on the south <br />side of Fairmont Parkway, they may want to stage them there. Mr. Truitt explained <br />that current plans and prospective clients for the facility are all clients that exist in <br />Bayport today. They will not be taking storage from facilities that are located in <br />other spots. <br />Mr. Lagen said that interest from the Bayport Industrial District has more than <br />committed for available space at this facility. The attractiveness of the facility for <br />plants is that they can order a car today and receive it tomorrow. Pensley is a <br />shortline rail company unlike the large carriers. <br />Chairman Waters asked where Pensley's existing facilities are located. Mr. Lagen said <br />there was one in Hot Springs, Arkansas, which is where his headquarters are located; <br />three railroads in Florida, one in South Carolina, and one in Massachusetts. The <br />company has been in existence since 1938. They also have three distribution centers; <br />one in Massachusetts, one in Florida, and one in Arkansas. <br />Howard Ebow was concerned with increased rail traffic crossing Fairmont Pkwy. if <br />ship channel industries on the north side of Fairmont utilize the facility. Mr. Lagen's <br />response was drat his company was looking at an additional 2 to 3 locations in the <br />greater Houston area to meet the present demand. In regards to possible rail <br />crossing improvements on Fairmont Pkwy., Mr. Lagen said his company would be <br />more than willing to work with the City to try and obtain funding from Intermodal <br />Service Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). <br />Mr. Rankin told the Commission that what was said by the group tonight is not what <br />was represented to him over the past 3 to 4 months. For example, he was told there <br />would not be any switching, only storage; there would be no hazardous chemicals, <br />only plastics; this would be an import/export park, not a rail storage switching <br />facility. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.