My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-16-1997 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1997
>
10-16-1997 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:35 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:54:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/16/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes of October 16, 1997 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />A replat of this property would result in the current four lots <br />becoming two independent tracts of land. <br />Mr. Rankin noted that staff had reviewed the request and <br />recommended its approval with conditions. <br />1. PROPONENTS <br />There were none. <br />2. OPPONENTS <br />There were none. <br />B. DISCUSS AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 106 OF THE CODE OF <br />ORDINANCES, REGARDING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS, <br />STRUCTURES, USES AND LOTS OF RECORD. <br />Mr. Rankin presented staffs report. He noted that the proposed <br />ordinance would give the property owner of anon-conformity an <br />opportunity to change the use or expand the property, within a <br />specked time frame. The overall goat of the ordinance is to <br />eliminate all non-conformities throughout the City over a specked <br />period of time that wilt be prescribed by the Zoning Board of <br />Adjustment. <br />Mr. Zoller noted he did not see any language in the ordinance that <br />would allow a use to change to another use in the same SIC <br />category or to a less intensive use. After discussing it further, <br />everyone agreed there should be a #3 added to Section 106-263 to <br />address Mr. Zoller's concern. It was also noted that the SIC code <br />should be used as a guide, however, allow for a staff determination <br />to be made as to the proposed use (with appeal to the Board of <br />Adjustment). <br />1. PROPONENTS <br />Bill Strong addressed the Commission on his own and on <br />behalf of the Old Hwy. 146 Committee. Mr. Strong noted <br />that the Committee, in general, agrees with what the City is <br />trying to do, however, some clarification is requested of the <br />following: <br />Page 4, #8. Why expand period to 180 days? Would <br />like to keep at the current 90 days. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.