My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
11-18-1999 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1999
>
11-18-1999 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:01:24 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:55:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
11/18/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 0 <br />Shipping Containers <br />P&Z 12/16/99 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />An outside storage of shipping containers use (SIC Code #3443) could be <br />completely eliminated from the City's Code of Ordinances. As the <br />establishment of these container yards is not attractive to the physical <br />development of La Porte. Furthermore, they do not enhance the visual <br />aesthetic character of the community. <br />On the other hand, the Port of Houston Authority has developed a master <br />plan for a new fully intermodal terminal at Bayport. A bond election was <br />held in November, 1999 and 380 million dollars were approved in order to <br />complete phase one of the Bayport expansion. This phase will complete <br />2600 feet of berth, 140 acres of container yard, equipment, utilities, access <br />improvements, a gate complex, a container freight station and numerous <br />other buildings. With these facilities in sight, staff feels the development of <br />container yards could be prohibited in the City of La Porte. <br />A second option that needs to be addressed deals with a zoning designation. <br />At present, outside storage of shipping containers are permitted in the Light <br />Industrial (LI) zones, subject to measures such as screening to a height of six <br />feet, lighting & glare, smoke, dust, and odor. The containers could be limited <br />to heavy industrial (Hp zones with minimum yard setbacks as front 50 ft., <br />rear 50ft., and side 30 ft., along with required 6% landscaping, which is <br />already a part of City's Code of Ordinances. <br />A third option to be examined is the standards and additional requirements <br />for LI zones in which the containers are permitted at present, as regulated by <br />Sections 106-521& 522 (b) of the Code of Ordinances. These standards <br />include regulations regarding height, setbacks, and landscaping & screening <br />The following recommendations could apply to the outside storage of <br />shipping containers in LI and HI zones, with a height limitation for <br />containers to be two (2) stacks high, a typically 7'9" plus the frame would be <br />16%18'high. At present, the maximum height allowed is 45 ft. or 2-5 stacks <br />high. The minimum front yard setback could be 50', whereas rear and side <br />setbacks would be 50' and 40' respectively. Whereas, required landscaping a <br />minimum of 10% shall be located in the front and side yards. This is an <br />increase from the present minimum 6% landscaping requirements. <br />Landscaping and screening shall be required for aesthetic impact of the area <br />and to screen it from public view (See Exhibits). Minimum height of plants <br />and trees at the time of planting would be 10-12 ft. with a minimum of 20 ft. <br />apart. A height of sixteen to eighteen feet could be realized in about 2-5 <br />years. A solid fence 6 ft. high would be another alternative for screening <br />with required landscaping in place on property. A suitable surface to control <br />dust and drainage would be either asphalt or concrete. <br />Conclusion: The above mentioned standards, in stars opinion, are reasonable and <br />workable. ff, there are other options for addressing this issue, staff would <br />welcome input and suggestions from the Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.