My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-17-2000 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
2000's
>
2000
>
08-17-2000 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:34 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:55:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/17/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Open House Public Comment <br />La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> <br />making Lomax School Road a through street from Spencer to Hwy. 225 and I am opposed <br />to any 4-lane stretch in Lomax. Let it stay an agricultural area. Thanks, Alton Meekins, <br />10315 North "H" Street <br />9) Extremely unusual that our Councilman and Mayor are not even herel I would really enjoy <br />discussing this, but with who? I am totally opposed to the road expansion on Farrington. If <br />you would like to discuss this you can reach me at 281-479-2450 or 281-471-8430. <br />10) I have listened to the City Fire and Police Chief presentation for road expansion. Nobody <br />with the City stated any cost saving for the City. I am against the Farrington Road <br />expansion completely. It will mean more traffic and a safety hazard for my children. I am <br />disturbed that the Mayor could not show up for this meeting! You can reach me at 281-470- <br />0758. Chris Santiago, 10610 N P, La Porte, TX, Solvay Polymers, Deer Park, TX <br />11) Perhaps, the most advantage, the City of La Porte gets out of this Comprehensive Study is <br />to change the image of this city from being a port-related type business community to a <br />"Bedroom Community". People can live here in La Porte and go to work somewhere else. <br />b. Bay Area water, the Gulf area is our biggest asset, but people get scared when they see <br />a bunch of trucks moving around and parked around. I think the City of La Porte should <br />not allow "Truck Stop" related operations where people get turned off and don't get a <br />very good impression about the City. Truck stop operation creates lots of problems, air <br />pollution, noise, too many lights around the stop. This kind of business must be stopped <br />in order to create a nice commerciaVresidential type impression. <br />c. One more thing, the City should encourage the owner of metal buildings around 146 (on <br />both the sides) to have them freshly painted. Maybe the City should consider providing <br />them a can of fresh paint. <br />d. Another thing is to do palm tree landscaping around Barbour's Cut, Main/Spencer and <br />Fairmont Parkway intersections. <br />e. Change the name of "Barbour's Cut Blvd." to something like "International Blvd., <br />Commerce Blvd., Bayshore Blvd., etc. to appeal to the outsiders. It is hard to spell <br />Barbour's Cut Blvd. I do not know why we have to constantly say we do not want <br />Farrington to have any extension across Spencer Highway to 225. We do have a school <br />with children that could be endangered by this! I teach my school children that the <br />government can be trusted and a vote does count. Your council members were told <br />what the voters wanted. Then you get a subcommittee and do exactly the opposite. <br />The plan for Farrington is not immediate, according to you. Just delayed. STOP IT! <br />Nancy Quested. P.S. I may have forgotten my glasses, but I will not forget your actions! <br />12) I believe that the City should seriously reconsider "opening up Lomax with the Phase I <br />Farrington connections as well as proposed H Street extensions and roads to the north of P <br />Street. This is a restricted neighborhood - not a dumping ground for through traffic and <br />container trucks. I have talked with TxDOT officials and studied the FAA. 150-5300-13 <br />Regulations and Standards and this road going through the RPZ goes against the safety <br />standards established in that document. As far as safety goes, the video going to council <br />says it all. Putting this road through an area of no sidewalks, deep ditches, and heavy, fast, <br />traffic isn't just a bad idea, it is a serious violation of public safety. Please view the video. <br />Bill Scott, 281-470-6682. <br />13) A meeting is supposed to be conducted in a manner that allows all involved to air their <br />opinion, discuss options and come to an equitable solution. This was nothing more than an <br />exhibition w/pretty pictures. Please don't waste our time unless you really plan on trying to <br />accomplish something. I am opposed to any kind of "new road" in the Lomax area! <br />Currently there is enough that needs to be "FIXED"I Hand P Street both need overlays - <br />not shoddy patch jobs that are worse than the potholes. The two schools in the area need <br />improvements. Currently we have children riding horses, walking livestock down the street - <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.