Laserfiche WebLink
Zone Change Request #R 02-001 <br />P & Z Feb 21, 2002 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Transportation — The tract in question has approximately 600 feet of <br />frontage along Driftwood Drive, a main access to the Fairmont Park East <br />Fairmont Parkway, a semi -controlled access highway should accommodate <br />the traffic generated by this development. Previously, the Commission <br />expressed interest in an internal access system for the General Commercial <br />area adjacent to Fairmont Parkway. This would limit and reduce the number <br />of future driveways directly connected to Fairmont Parkway. However, the <br />Commission can address this issue during review and approval. of the <br />amended General Plan. (Staff is currently reviewing the plan.) <br />Parks and Recreation — The nearest park facility is the Fairmont Park East <br />Homeowners Association Pack at the corner of Mesquite and Driftwood <br />Drive. The HOA Board previously contacted the City regarding parkland <br />issues. The association is willing to discuss development of the detention <br />basin into usable parkland/open space. <br />Utilities — There is sufficient water and sewer facilities in the vicinity to . <br />provide service to this proposed development As far as public infrastructure <br />issues are concemed, it will be developer's responsibility to provide any <br />structures or improvements necessary to accommodate water and sanitary <br />sewer. Storm water drainage and detention is to the north of the property. <br />Residential Development — The intent of the Comprehensive Plan is to <br />provide for attractive low -density residential neighborhoods. The <br />neighborhood protection standards applicable to this project may include <br />physical screening, increased setbacks, and use of open space buffers. <br />Currently, the zoning ordinance allows building setbacks of 20-20-10 as a <br />buffer between residential and non-residential uses.'The Commission may <br />want to consider additional buffering between uses during review of the <br />General Plan. <br />Conclusion: Staff suggests that during review of the General Plan, items such as <br />increased setbacks and deeper lots be considered to make R-1 more <br />compatible with GC. At this time, staff recommends that the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission approve this zone change request with the modification <br />that Reserve A for GC (0.40 ac.) is also rezoned to R-1. The change would <br />represent the highest and best use of the property. Furthermore, the change is <br />not contrary to the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Actions available to the Commission are <br />• Recommend approval of the zone change as requested <br />• Recommend denial of the zone change as requested <br />• Recommend approval of a modified version of the zone change <br />