Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes of June 17; 2004 <br />Page 4 <br />block of Powell Rd., for development of an industrial park containing rail operations,' <br />warehousing, industrial and commercial uses. :The original request was approved as <br />#SCU98-001 with one time extension granted, but expired due to a lack of.activity. The <br />applicant resubmitted and received approval of #SCU02-002 and one. time extension. <br />was granted, which is due to expire June 20, 2004. ' <br />Mr. Sabo stated that the applicant attended. a coordination meeting with City staff. -The. <br />applicant is concerned that present conditions require changes to,' the current <br />Development Agreement that is associated with the permit.. The outstanding issues are <br />too complex for staff to make a recommendation at this time. 'Mr. Sabo outlined the <br />outstanding issues, which are detailed in staffs report. <br />Public notices were mailed to six property. owners. The City' received one .response in <br />favor of the request. <br />Stuart Haynsworth; general partner, addressed the Commission. Mr. Haynsworth feels <br />that changes to the current Development Agreement are necessary. Mr. Haynsworth <br />spoke about previous plans for the project that fell through. He would like to return to. <br />the Commission with a. new plan in July. <br />Doyle Toups, 819 Heathcliff, Houston, TX, addressed the Commission. Mr. Toups <br />answered questions from the Commission.; During discussion. he stated that in order to <br />develop Phase 1, Gordon Westegren would need to enter into a partnership agreement - . <br />with other parties to complete financing/leasing of the property. <br />:. The following issues were discussed: <br />• Site plan submittal <br />• Dedication/improvement to Powell Rd. <br />• Phase I -A development (strip of land contiguous to UPRR containing two rail <br />lines) <br />• Phase I development (first warehouse, with rail access) . <br />• Access from Powell .Rd: <br />• Traffic flow concept. for.entite project <br />The applicant will be ready .to submit the new plan at the July meeting. <br />The following comments were received under Agenda Item 7: '. Staff Reports, <br />Dean Snider, 202 Bay Colony and member of the Old Hwy. ' 146 Committee, addressed <br />the Commission, Mr. Snider has .major concerns about pollution, traffic, and noise. He <br />is worried about the City's image with rail lines on one side of SH 146 and proposed low-. <br />income housing on the other side of SH -146. <br />Fran Strong,' 2711 Crescent View, addressed the Commission: Ms. Strong . will be, <br />directly across from the noise and pollution from this project. This project will create a <br />negative. impact on the golf. course and surrounding residences. She feels the <br />Commission should not consider approval. <br />