Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commis~on <br />Minutes of February 17, 2005 <br />Page 8 <br />Staff recommended approval of the Special Conditional Use Permit. Additional reviews <br />will follow at a later date to review an amended general plan and plat. Mr. Sabo asked <br />the City Attorney to advise the Commission on their options due to the pending litigation. <br />Mr. Askins wanted to make sure the Commission was aware of their options. The <br />Commission could table the action indefinitely for the purpose of ascertaining more <br />information or continue the public hearing to a time, date, and location specific. <br />Ms. Haynsworth does not think the City should be concerned with the litigation, but with <br />development issues relating to the land. He noted that postponing action would be of <br />detriment to the owners since market conditions are currently favorable for import/export <br />businesses. <br />Russell Plank, resident of Houston, Texas, is a Developer on the west side of Powell Rd. <br />He is concemed about the portions of the property that are planned for commercial <br />development that are clear of litigation. It is important for his company, National <br />Property Holdings, LP, to receive approval. <br />Joe Fogarty noted that if he ends up being involved in the property, his plans included a <br />100' landscape buffer between the building and Powell Rd. Mr. Fogarty does not <br />oppose the other portion moving forward. <br />Mr. Sabo clarified that the City is dealing with a general plan and gland -use concept with <br />the representative of the landholders. The City is not a party to the litigation. If the <br />litigation were to change something, then the general. plan would need to be <br />resubmitted. <br />Motion by Dottie Kaminski to recommend to City Council, approval of Special <br />Conditional Use Permit #S0005-003 for the development of Texas Import/Export Park in <br />the 2000 Block of Powell Rd. with the following conditions: <br />1. This SCUP does not go into effect until amended General Plan, Development <br />Agreement, and all other supporting documents are considered by the <br />Commission & approved by City Council. <br />2. This SCUP is not applicable to any specific development anticipated or proposed <br />by this General Plan. <br />3. This SCUP outlines in general terms the proposed Planned Unit Development. <br />The developer recognizes and understands that any future construction or <br />development of the private or public improvements anticipated by this SCUP and <br />the General Plan shall require further submittal and approval of plats, site plans, <br />construction drawings, engineering analysis, covenants, etc. <br />4. Said submittals shall be in accordance with the SCUP, the approved General <br />Plan, and the future approved Development Agreement. <br />5. The Developer shall comply with all other applicable laws and ordinances of the <br />City of La Porte and the State of Texas. <br />Second by Nick Barrera. The motion carried. <br />Ayes: Kaminski, Barrera, Finch, Berner, Lawler, Bird and Muston <br />Nays: None <br />Abstain: None <br />