Laserfiche WebLink
Plannin and Zonin Commiss• • <br />9 9 <br />Minutes of Sepetmber 15, 2005 <br />Page 5 <br />• DELICIA TURNER <br />Mrs. Turner was the head of the Large Lot Committee. She explained some of the reasons <br />for support of the proposal. <br />C. OPPONENTS <br />BETH RAWLS, N P.STREET, LA PORTE, TX <br />Asa 27 year resident, Mrs. Rawls dislikes the restrictions placed on the number of animals <br />permitted. <br />SIDNEY GRANT, 1907 LOMAX DR., LA PORTE, TX <br />Mr. Grant believes that the City would be taking property by prohibiting future development in <br />the proposed Large Lot District, if it were approved. He believes that a rural atmosphere <br />does not depend on the number of animals permitted, and he makes the suggestion of '/2 <br />acre minimum lots to ensure that those with an interest in animals would be able to purchase <br />at least an acre without prohibiting others from subdividing into what he still considers to be <br />large lots. <br />• MARGARET CLUCK <br />Mrs. Cluck believes that the proposed Large Lot District would be a restriction of property <br />rights, and she requested (and was granted) exclusion from consideration due to the non- <br />contiguous location of her property, which has been landlocked by residential development <br />on all sides. <br />• LEROY JONES <br />A 39 year resident, Mr. Jones was forced to give. up his cattle in order for development to <br />take place. He believes the proposed Large Lot District, if approved, is a violation of property <br />rights. <br />9. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />8:03 PM <br />10. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING CREATION OF A LARGE <br />LOT DISTRICT (LL), CONSIDER ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS FOR THIS DISTRICT, ADOPT <br />BOUNDARIES, AND CONSIDER A REZONE FROM LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) AND <br />MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO LARGE LOT DISTRICT. <br />Motion to approve creation of the proposed Large Lot District was made by Hal Lawler. The <br />following items must be addressed prior to formal recommendation to City Council: <br />• A Memo from the Staff on the possibility of Variance Requests, and the requirements <br />thereof. <br />Second by Doretta Finch. The motion carried. <br />Ayes: Muston, Kaminski, Finch, Lawler (Alt. 1), Bird, and Linscomb. <br />Nays: Barerra <br />Abstain: None <br />