Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit "A" <br /> Scope of Services <br /> Under contract to the Houston - Galveston Area Council (H -GAC) through their PlanSource Program, <br /> Kendig Keast Collaborative (KKC) will assist the City of La Porte to prepare an update to its 2001 <br /> Comprehensive Plan. KKC will individually manage the requisite services, possibly with some limited <br /> technical services offered by KSA Engineers. This consultant involvement and facilitation will be carried <br /> out according to this Scope of Services and contingent upon the Support Services outlined in Exhibit "B." <br /> It is important to note that this is an update to the 2001 Comprehensive Plan and the amendment <br /> conducted by staff in 2005. As such, the plan document will remain as a firm foundation, with updates, <br /> revisions, and supplements as required to express the community's vision and planning objectives. We <br /> expect much of the content to remain, where appropriate, with added narrative and updated tables, <br /> figures, and maps. This approach is vital to make efficient use of the available project resources. <br /> Task 1 1 Citizen Involvement <br /> It is not expected that a full - fledged public involvement effort is necessary at this stage. However, it <br /> would be useful to facilitate several small group interviews to solicit community input. The purpose of <br /> these meetings is to understand current issues and discuss their priorities as to where the City should <br /> focus its planning efforts. The meetings would be arranged as follows: <br /> • Six, one -hour meetings with groups representing: 1) neighborhood associations, groups, and <br /> advocates; 2) business and industry owners and chamber representatives; 3) landowners and <br /> developers; 4) downtown area associations and property owners; 5) transportation officials and <br /> interest groups; and 6) those interested in community livability (concerning parks and recreation, <br /> beautification, civic spaces, etc.). <br /> • An invitation list of 10 to 15 persons each would be prepared by the City, with written invitations <br /> sent out three weeks in advance. The City would follow the letters with telephone calls to verify <br /> attendance, with a second call two days prior as a reminder and to get RSVPs. <br /> In addition to the small group interviews, the Planning and Zoning Commission would serve in an <br /> advisory capacity to oversee the plan development process. Generally, these meetings would be held <br /> concurrent with their regularly scheduled meetings on the third Thursday of each month. The meeting <br /> schedule for the update process would be as follows: <br /> • Meeting No. 1 would be a meeting to overview the plan development process with the Planning and <br /> Zoning Commission and to solicit their preliminary feedback on any new directions of the plan. This <br /> meeting would be held on the same day as the small group interviews. <br /> • Meeting No. 2 would be for the purpose of reviewing and discussing Chapter 1, Plan Context and <br /> Chapter 2, Land Use and Character and engaging the Commission in a future land use planning <br /> exercise. Chapter 3, Infrastructure and Growth Capacity would be previewed at this meeting. <br /> • Meeting No. 3 would be for the purpose of reviewing and discussing Chapter 3, Infrastructure and <br /> Growth Capacity and previewing Chapter 4, Community Mobility. The results of the land use <br /> planning exercise would be presented by the Commission to the consultant for consideration in <br /> developing the Future Land Use Plan concurrent with Chapter 4, Community Mobility. <br /> Exhibit "A" - Scope of Services (02/25/11) Page 1 of 8 <br />