Laserfiche WebLink
Question and Answer:Commissioner Follis inquiries about landscaping requirements and the <br /> proximity of fire hydrants. Both of which have been achieved <br /> Motion by Commissioner Kendrick to approve the Major Development Site Plan presented <br /> to the commission <br /> Second by Commissioner Warren Motion to approve carried. <br /> Ayes: Commissioners Barrera, Follis,Smith,Tschappatt, Warren, Pitzer, Martin, Kendrick and <br /> Chairman Lawler <br /> Nays: None Motion to approve passes,9-0 <br /> Major Development Site Plan (6:06pm): Consider approval of the major development site <br /> plan #18-83000002, Port Crossing Building A2; a 12.43 Acre development located at 1912 S. <br /> 16th St. <br /> Staff Presentation: Mr. Ian Clowes, City Planner, presented staff's report on a request of <br /> approval for a Major Development Site Plan for a building to be located at 1912 S. 16th <br /> 164,000+Sq. Ft Office/Warehouse development for the Port Crossing development. With no <br /> outstanding comments,City staff has recommended approval of the Major Development Site <br /> Plan. <br /> Applicant Presentation: Mr.Jacob Fuller explains to the commission the proximity to the rail <br /> lines required the addition of "dry fire-lines" per the request of the City's Fire Marshal to <br /> meet fire code. Reiterates how Fire Marshal's Office has provided a stamp of approval for <br /> how the fire lane/plan has been drawn. <br /> Question and Answer: Commissioner Follis asks if the site plan has a fire lane added that <br /> meets the requirements of the International Fire Code. The designer of the project makes <br /> note that the site plan had previously obtained FMO (Fire Marshal Office) approval. <br /> Commissioner Follis requests that there is additional review to make sure that compliance is <br /> met by the developer. Commissioner Follis also questioned the setback requirements for the <br /> nearby pipeline for the property in question. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Follis to approve the proposed site plan, with the condition that <br /> additional review from the Fire Marshal's Office would be required for the fire lane <br /> requirements and pipeline set back requirements. <br /> Second by Commissioner Smith Motion to approve Carried <br />