11-07-1989 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• Board of Adjustment Minutes of 11-7-89 Page 3 of 5 Mr. Mosier ask at this time that Mr. Couch comment on the proposal made by his clients. At this point Mr. David Couch addressed the Board of Adjustments. Mr. Couch stated that he had no objections to moving the building back some, in fact he said he needed to get it a little further back to serve the purpose he needed to serve, but it was not feasible for him to put it on the back side of his lot. If he put the building on the back side of the lot it would be more expense to him, because he would have to build a road to the building and he would have land that he could not use. He would be willing to go 60-65 ft. back off the property line from the road side, if everybody agrees to this. Chairman Bernay called for a minute recess at this time for the parties concerned to discuss (off the record) the proposals made and see if an agreement could be reached. RECESS - 7:15 - 7:30 pm Meeting was called back to order and Mr. Mosier again stated to the Board the feelings of his clients and ask that the Board deny this permit. Gary Davis was sworn in at this time and proceeded with his testimony. In defense of his position he stated his concerns as the drainage problem that could be created, the fire hazard as presented by this building and the property value. Mr. Davis felt that there were other alternatives that Mr. Couch could look into on the placement of the building in question. Joel Albrecht was sworn in at this time. He then summarized the background of the issuance of the building permit to Mr. Couch. Mr. Albrecht then went over the findings required of the Board in order to grant an appeal, they are as follows: A. That there is a reasonable difference of interpretation as to the specific intent of the zoning regulations or zoning map, provided the interruption of the enforcement officer is a reasonable presumption and the zoning ordinance is unreasonable. B. That the resulting interpretation will not grant a special privilege to one property inconsistent with other properties or uses similarly situated.