My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
12-14-1989 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1980's
>
1989
>
12-14-1989 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:18 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/14/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ci' <br /> <br />r: <br />VARIANCE REQUEST ~V90-001 PAGE -2- <br />With the adoption of Zoning Ordinance 1501, the minimum <br />sideyard setback on a lot containing a five (5) foot utility <br />easement was effectively increased to eight (8) feet. If <br />granted, the variance being sought by the developer, would allow <br />homes on the affected lots to be located immediately adjacent to <br />the five (5) to ten (10) foot easements in the manner originally <br />intended. <br />ANALYSIS• <br />Section 11-606 defines the term variance as follows: <br />The term "variance" shall mean a deviation <br />from the literal provisions of the Zoning <br />Ordinance which is granted by the Board when <br />strict conformity to the Zoning Ordinance <br />would case an unnecessary hardship because of <br />the circumstances unique to the property on <br />which the variance is granted. <br />® ~` Section 11-606 also sets the following conditions, all of <br />which must be met in order for a variance to be granted. <br />Except as otherwise prohibited, the Board is empowered <br />to authorize a variance from a requirement of the <br />Zoning Ordinance when the Board finds that all of the <br />following conditions have been met: <br />1. That the granting of the variance <br />will not be contrary to the public <br />interest. <br />2. That literal enforcement of the <br />Ordinance will result in <br />unnecessary hardship because of <br />exceptional narrowness, <br />shallowness, shape, topography or <br />other extraordinary or exceptional <br />physical situation unique to the <br />'specific piece of property in <br />question. "Unnecessary hardship" <br />shall .mean physical hardship <br />relating to the property itself as <br />distinguished from a hardship <br />relating to convenience, financial <br />considerations or caprice, and the <br />• hardship must not result from the <br />applicant or property owner's own <br />actions; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.