Laserfiche WebLink
<br />® ' <br />SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST #SE90-001 <br /> <br />Requested For• <br />Location• <br />Zoning: <br />Requested Bv: <br />Requested Relief: <br />Roelof's <br />Lts 27 & 28 of Blk 39; Town of La Porte <br />which is further described as 301 West <br />Main Street. (See Exhibit A). <br />General Commercial (G.C.) <br />Roelof and Judy Nieuwenhuis, owners <br />A. Special exception as provided for <br />Section 11-605.2.6.3, to the si <br />coverage requirements of Sec. 6-5 <br />1501). Exception would allow t <br />side setback adjacent to a public <br />reduced to zero feet and further <br />coverage of 40~ to be increased to <br />by Zoning Ordinance <br />de set-back and lot <br />00 Table B (Ordinance <br />he required ten-foot <br />right-of-way to be <br />allow the maximum lot <br />66~. <br />B. Special exception as provided for by Zoning Ordinance <br />Section 11-605.C, to waive the off-street parking <br />requirements of Section 10-609 (Ordinance 1501). <br />Background: <br />Roelof 's is a <br />combination retail antique/furniture refinishing shop which has <br />been located at 301 West Main for approximately 2 1/2 years. At <br />the time the building was purchased by the applicants, it was <br />being considered for demolition as a dangerous building. The <br />Nieuwenhuis! since acquiring the building have been actively <br />engaged in its renovation. To date the restoration and <br />remodeling which has taken place has primarily involved repairs <br />to the existing structure. Setback, lot coverage and parking <br />requirements have therefore, not been at issue. <br />The existing building occupies <br />feet or 38$ of the total lot area. <br />building is located on the property 1 <br />2nd Street right-of-way boundary. Th <br />property line along this face of th <br />proposed by the Nieuwenhuis' would <br />(See Exhibit A). The proposed setback <br />foot setback requirement of Footnote <br />B. <br />approximately 2295 square <br />The eastern face of the <br />ine which is also the south <br />ere is no setback from the <br />e building. The addition <br />extend this building line. <br />is in conflict with the 10 <br />#3 to Section 6-500, Table <br />• <br />