My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
05-10-1990 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1990
>
05-10-1990 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:18 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page -3- <br />The Zoning Ordinance Parking Table <br />parking for manufacturing facilities to <br />A minimum of four (4) spaces plus three <br />and one (1) per 1.5 employees. Assuming <br />of employees, twenty six (26) additional <br />required for this addition. <br />• <br />(Section 10-609) requires <br />be provided as follows: <br />(3) per 1,000 square feet <br />no change to the number <br />parking spaces would be <br />Presently, excluding the eight (8) unused parking spaces in <br />question, there is an area in front of building #1 large enough <br />to accommodate 6 to 8 vehicles. A large overhead door in the <br />front of the building precludes additional parking on this face. <br />Additionally, while the twenty one (21) foot front setback allows <br />vehicles to be parked on premises, vehicle maneuvering must be <br />done on the 16th Street right-of-way. The applicant, to the best <br />of the City's knowledge, is not proposing to develop any <br />additional parking to facilitate this addition. <br />Conclusion: <br />In making its determination as to whether or not granting <br />this request will adversely affect neighboring properties or be <br />contrary to the best public interest, the Board should consider <br />the above factors as well as the following question: Are the <br />parking arrangements far the facility currently adequate anal will <br />they remain so if the addition is constructed as proposed? The <br />answser to this question will determine the projects impact on <br />neighboring properties and public interest. <br />Options• <br />1. Approve Special Exception SE90-002 as requested. <br />2. Deny Special Exception SE90-002 <br />3. Table request for further consideration at a future <br />date. <br />:~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.