Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ReQuested For: <br /> <br />Zonin~: <br /> <br />ReQuested By: <br /> <br />Puroose of ReQuest: <br /> <br />Bacqround: <br /> <br />~i~~~I[li~liljl~~ill~il <br />$,~9~t;1)~)>> <br /> <br />9626 Carlow Lane which is further described as Lot 310; Block <br />18; Spenwick Place II. (See Exhibit A) <br /> <br />R-l, Low Density Residential <br /> <br />Ms. Dana Kay Murphy, resident on behalf of Ms. Shirley <br />Trowbridge, property owner. <br /> <br />Special Exception is requested to allow the height of an existing <br />front yard fence to be increased to 6 feet, 9 inches. <br /> <br />This request concerns a fence that was either modified or <br />reconstructed without a building permit. The matter was <br />brought to staffs attention by a complaint. Staff has received <br />conflicting information regarding this matter. The information <br />in this report reflects staffs best understanding of the facts. <br /> <br />There is an existing chainlink front yard fence located on the <br />applicant's property. The height of this fence is approximately <br />5 feet, 6 inches. An aerial photograph of the Spenwick area <br />(taken in 1984) indicates that some form of front yard fence has <br />been located on this property for a least 8 years. Sometime <br />before January 31 of this year, the applicants constructed a <br />wooden fence along the west face of their property. It is <br />located immediately adjacent to the original chainlink fence <br />which is still in place. The new fence is between 6 feet, 9 <br />inches and 7 feet in height. <br /> <br />In February, 1992, the applicants were given notice (by certified <br />mail) that they were in violation of City Ordinance for failing <br />to obtain a building permit prior to erecting the fence and for <br />erecting a fence that is taller than the 6 feet, 6 inch maximum <br />height allowed by Section 10-503. (See Exhibit B) <br />