My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-24-1992 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1992
>
09-24-1992 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/24/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Special Exception Request #SE92-004 <br /> <br />The second option would be to have the easement closed and <br />abandoned. It is staffs understanding that the applicant is <br />going to pursue this option. It is, however, a time consuming <br />process ultimately requiring the lot in question to be replatted. <br />The third option is to petition the Board of Adjustment for a <br />Special Exception to allow the two (2) foot encroachment. This <br />is the purpose of this request. <br /> <br />Analysis: <br /> <br />The Special Exception requested by the applicant is not <br />specifically listed by the Zoning Ordinance. Section 4-201 does, <br />however, empower the Board to consider special exceptions <br />concerning non-conforming structures. The garage is <br />considered non-conforming due to the easement encroachment. <br />Additionally, Ordinance Section 11-605 allows the Board to <br />consider exceptions concerning deviations to yard requirements. <br />The request also falls into this general category. The Board <br />should, therefore, be empowered to consider this request. <br /> <br />In making a determination, the Board must consider the <br />ordinance requirement that a special exception only be granted <br />if it can be shown that granting will not "adversely affect the <br />value and use of adjacent or neighboring property or be <br />contrary to the best public interest (Section 11-605.2)". <br /> <br />City records confirm the applicant's statement that the utility <br />easement is unused. Given the easement's location, staff feels <br />that it is not likely to be used for future utilities. The house <br />and garage satisfy all other ordinance requirements for setback <br />and lot coverage. The structures comply with flood elevation <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Conclusion & Recommendation: <br /> <br />Based on the facts of this case, granting the requested exception <br />would not adversely affect neighboring property, nor does it <br />appear to be contrary to the best public interest. Under the <br />guidelines of the Ordinance Sections 4-201 and 11-605, the <br />request is eligible to be considered for a special exception. <br />Staff, therefore, recommends granting Special exception SE92- <br />004. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.