Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This alley separates lots 2-5 from the remaining property. <br />There are no improvements on these lots except a shell <br />driveway. As a separate tract without "nonconformities", Lots <br />2-5 are not eligible for consideration as part of this request. <br />Lots 6-21 are the only lots which may be considered. <br /> <br />The other major provision of paragraph 2.a regards the <br />eventual "return of the property to a conforming use." <br />Miniwarehouse buildings are rather specialized structures which <br />are not readily adaptable to non-storage business activities. <br />The addition of eleven more storage units on the property will <br />decrease the likelihood of the property being returned to a <br />conforming Commercial use. <br /> <br />Another consideration for this tract is availability of utilities, <br />specifically water for fire protection. City Ordinance requires <br />that fire hydrants be located within 300 feet of nomesidential <br />buildings. This measurement is taken along street and driveway <br />lines and is calculated from the hydrant to the farthest point of <br />the building in question. (The existing warehouse buildings <br />predate this requirement.) <br /> <br />The closest existing fire hydrant is over 500 feet from the <br />present buildings. The closest water line capable of supplying <br />adequate water to a fire-hydrant is located at the southwestern <br />corner of the Utah/East Main intersection. This is too far away <br />to provide fire protection to the portion of the tract for which <br />the special exception is being requested (see Exhibit A). Even <br />if this request were granted, additional warehouses could not be <br />constructed unless a new water line, with capacity to supply a <br />fire hydrant, was first extended to the tract in question. <br /> <br />The final condition the Board is required to consider is impact <br />on the value and use of neighboring property. Exhibit "B" is an <br />excerpt from the City's Zoning Map. The tract in question is <br />zoned General Commercial. The property immediately to the <br />north is zoned R-2, Mid Density Residential. Expanding the <br />nonconforming use at this location could certainly impact the <br />value of surrounding properties. It could also decrease the <br />likelihood of surrounding properties being developed in the <br />manner intended by the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />