My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-02-1993 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1993
>
09-02-1993 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/2/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Staff Report of 9/23/93 <br /># A93-001 <br /> <br />mobile home, manufactured prior to 1976, may, on the same <br />lot, be replaced by a manufactured home, constructed <br />subsequent to 1976. Mobile homes and manufactured homes <br />are substantially the same type of dwelling. The difference in <br />designation is largely based on the date of manufacture. <br /> <br />The prospective buyer was told that due to the fact that the <br />original mobile home had previously been removed from the <br />property, state law was not applicable. Based on this <br />determination, a manufactured home could not be placed on <br />the property. <br /> <br />The buyer subsequently provided the City with copies of titles <br />for two (2) homes. One for his manufactured home, the other <br />for a pre-1976 mobile home titled to Mr. and Mrs. Hicks, the <br />applicants. The buyer was again informed that due to the fact <br />that the original mobile home had been previously removed <br />from the property, a manufactured home could not be placed <br />on the property. It was at this point that Mrs. Hicks, the <br />applicant, contacted the City. <br /> <br />Mrs. Hicks was informed that two (2) issues are involved. The <br />first issue, which is the only one being considered in this case, <br />is abandonment of the nonconforming use. It is the City's <br />determination that given the time that has passed since the <br />mobile home was removed, the nonconforming use is <br />abandoned and cannot be resumed. <br /> <br />The second issue is in regards to state law. In order for this <br />law to apply, a request for replacement must be initiated while <br />the original home is still in place on the property in question. <br />Again, since the original home was previously removed, this law <br />is not applicable. <br /> <br />Mrs. Hicks, at this point, expressed her desire to appeal the <br />City's determination. In addition to the zoning issue, a question <br />regarding state law is involved, the matter was referred to the <br />City Attorney's office for review. In a verbal determination, <br />Mr. Armstrong, the Assistant City Attorney indicated the <br />following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.