My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-28-1993 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA (2)
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1993
>
10-28-1993 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/28/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Minutes of October 28, 1993 <br /> <br />Mark Lewis reported to the Board that the City had received a complaint <br />regarding the parking of trucks in a residential area. During investigation of <br />the complaint, the City Inspector found two (2) Gruman truck tractors and a <br />Groman trailer on the property. One of the trucks was operable, the other <br />inoperable. The Inspector determined that trucks owned by the applicant, Mr. <br />Randolph N. Morvant, Jr., are considered truck tractors and commercial <br />vehicles per the terms of Zoning Ordinance 1501. Based on the Inspector's <br />determination, this type of vehicle cannot be parked or stored in a residential <br />zone. The Inspector informed the owner that the trucks could not be parked <br />on that particular property (2410 Crescent Drive). Mr. Morvant removed the <br />trailer and the inoperative truck tractor from the property. The applicant has <br />registered the operable vehicle as a pickup truck and based on this <br />registration, contends that this type of vehicle is indeed a pickup truck, not a <br />truck tractor. He disagrees with the Inspector's determination and wishes to <br />continue parking this type of vehicle at his home. <br /> <br />Mr. Lewis summarized the events that resulted in the appeal being filed. <br /> <br />Mr. Lewis stated there were 18 public notices mailed to adjacent property <br />owners. Five (5) replies were received; one (1) from Mr. Morvant in favor <br />of the appeal, four (4) were in opposition. <br /> <br />Mr. Lewis stated the Inspector's determination regarding this matter was <br />based on several points. <br /> <br />He noted that under the definitions Section 3-100 of the Zoning Ordinance, <br />a truck tractor is defined as "every motor vehicle designed and used primarily <br />for drawing other vehicles and not so constructed as to carry a load other than <br />a part of the weight of the vehicle and load so drawn". In addition, the <br />definition of a commercial motor vehicle is defined as "any motor vehicle <br />designed or used for the transportation of persons or property for hire, with <br />a rated carrying capacity in excess of one ton, including every vehicle used for <br />delivery purposes". As defined by the Zoning Ordinance, the trucks in <br />question are clearly truck tractors. Mr. Lewis noted that the trailer was not <br />referenced in Mr. Morvant's appeal and that he is not appealing the fact that <br />the trailer is an inappropriate type of vehicle to be placed on the property. <br />Per the DPS, the "Gross Vehicle Weight Rating" (GVWR) for the trucks is <br />8,000 to 9,000 pounds. Since this rated carrying capacity is in excess of one <br />ton, the trucks are clearly defined as commercial motor vehicles. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.