Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 4 of 4 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Staff Report of OS/26/94 <br />V94-006 <br /> <br />The type of structure proposed is typical is residential neighborhoods. It is not <br />unusually large. The awning is designed to work in conjunction with a patio slab <br />that satisfies all ordinance requirements. Ordinance conflict is due solely to <br />factors relating to property configuration. Construction of the proposed awning <br />would not violate the spirit or intent of the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />Conclusion <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Denying this variance would impose a hardship by restricting reasonable <br />use of the applicant's property. <br /> <br />. The hardship would result from strictly applying ordinance requirements <br />to an unusually configured piece of property. <br /> <br />. Granting the variance would not be contrary to the best public interest. <br /> <br />. Granting the variance would not violate the spirit or intent of the Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />Based on these facts and considerations, staff recommends granting variance <br />request V94-006 subject to the following conditions. <br /> <br />. No portion of the awning shall be located closer than two feet to <br />the rear property line. <br /> <br />. The variance shall allow construction of an awning only. There <br />shall be no enclosing walls. <br /> <br />. The variance does not superceed any building code requirements. <br />