My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
04-28-1994 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1994
>
04-28-1994 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting ZBOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
4/28/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 5 of 7 <br />Zoning Board of Adjusttnent <br />Minutes of April 28, 1994 <br /> <br />A motion was made by Sidney Grant to deny Variance Request V94-004. <br />The motion was seconded by Bob Capen. The motion was defeated by a <br />vote of 2-3. Members voting against the motion were Charles Christensen <br />and Chairman Bernay; voting in favor of the motion to deny the variance <br />request were Bob Capen, Willie Walker and Sidney Grant. In order to <br />approve a variance request, the Zoning Ordinance requires four <br />atrmnative votes for approval. Since there were not 4 votes in favor of <br />the granting the variance, the request was denied. <br /> <br />V. CONSIDER VARIANCE REQUFST V94-00S, REQUFSTED FOR 3209 OLD <br />mCKORY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALWWING CONSTRUCTION OF A <br />SWIMMING POOL WITH REDUCED SETBACKS ADJACENT TO HOUSE <br />AND UTILITY EASEMENT. <br /> <br />Mr. Lewis stated that this request was made for 3209 Old ffickory in Fairmont <br />Park. The request is being made by Dr. Reed Tolles, property owner. The <br />purpose of the request is to allow for the construction of a backyard swimming <br />pool with a setback of 4 feet adjacent to the home and a 0 setback adjacent to the <br />rear utility easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Lewis added that 18 public notices were mailed and 4 were returned in favor <br />of the request. There were no replies received in opposition. <br /> <br />Mr. Lewis stated that the property in question backs up to a pipeline corridor. <br />An entire 20 feet of easement is located in the rear yard. It is more typical to see <br />16 foot utility easements is subdivisions such as this, rather than 20 foot <br />easements. Staff feels that this unusually large easement presents a hardship to <br />the owner. Staff <br />feels that with careful pool design and engineer design, this variance will observe <br />the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the variance <br />request with the following conditions: <br /> <br />. No portion of pool or permanent deck structure shall encroach into <br />the utility easement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.