Laserfiche WebLink
. . • <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Minutes of January 26, 1994 <br />• Granting this variance would constitute a significant compromise of <br />Ordinance lot coverage limits. <br />• These limits were established as the regulatory means for implementing the <br />goals of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />• The goals of the Comprehensive Plan are intended to protect and enhance <br />the best public interest of the City of ~I.a Porte. <br />• There are no property conditions creating an unnecessary hardship. <br />• Allowing, in the absence of an unnecessary hardship, construction of a new <br />nonconforming structure is directly contrary to the intent of Section 4-200, <br />which calls for nonconforming uses and structures to be avoided. <br />• Granting this variance would, therefore, not uphold the spirit of the Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br />A. PROPONENTS <br />Chairman Bernay swore in Mark Follis. Mr. Follis noted the <br />present facility does not meet minimum landscaping and parking <br />requirements. Mr. Follis added he owned property in close <br />proximity to the tract in question and stated for the record he is in <br />favor of the request. <br />Chairman Bernay swore in Curtis Watkins. Mr. Watkins stated he is <br />currently leasing property on Broadway that he uses for storage. He <br />would like to be able to utilize the new facility to include storage. <br />If this were possible he would be able to discontinue leasing <br />additional space. It is also an inconvenience for him to transport <br />merchandise to and from storage by running a forklift on Broadway <br />Street. <br />Chairman Bernay swore in Gus Breiden. Mr. Breiden owns <br />property close to the tract in question. He stated he is in favor of <br />the request. <br />