Laserfiche WebLink
~ ~ <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Board of Adjustment <br />Staff Report of 7-6-95 <br />#A95-002 <br />On May 26, Mr. Smith submitted a building permit request for the front yard fence. Section <br />10-502 of Zoning Ordinance 1501 states "in case of large lot residential lots [home sites <br />comprised of one or more acres], six feet (6') perimeter fences are allowed as an accessory <br />use. As noted above, the applicant's property is under an acre in size. Based on these <br />factors, the permit application was denied by City Inspector Debbie Wihnore. Mr. Smith <br />is appealing the permit denial. <br />Analysis: <br />Zoning Ordinance Section 11-603.1 empowers the Board of Adjustment to: <br />Hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is an error in any order, <br />requirement, decision or determination made by the enforcement officer in the <br />enforcement of this ordinance. <br />Ordinance Section 11-604.03 establishes criteria under which an appeal is to be reviewed. <br />The Board is empowered to grant an appeal only when it finds that all three of the <br />following criteria have been satisfied. <br />That there is a reasonable difference or interpretation as to the specific intent <br />of the zoning regulations or zoning map, provided the interpretation of the <br />enforcement officer is a reasonable presumption and the zoning ordinance is <br />unreasonable. <br />That the resulting interpretation will not grant a special privilege to one <br />property inconsistent with other properties or uses similarly situated. <br />The decision of the board must be in the best interest of the community and <br />consistent with the spirit and interest of the City's zoning laws and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City of La Porte. <br />The first of these criteria is a test of intent and interpretation. Specifically, is there a <br />reasonable difference in interpretation of ordinance intent and; if the enforcing officer's <br />interpretation is reasonable; is the ordinance itself unreasonable? <br />The inspector's interpretation of ordinance was clearly correct. This lot is less than one acre <br />in size. Although it is a sizeable lot, it is enough under one acre that a decision to approve <br />the fence permit would have overstepped reasonable administrative latitude. The next <br />question to consider is whether the ordinance itself is unreasonable. <br />