Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Staff Report of 7/27/95 <br />V95-003 <br />That by granting the variance, the spirit of the ordinance will be <br />observed. <br />That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the <br />public interest. <br />Before considering the preceding criteria, it will be helpful to <br />consider the intent and purpose of the Business Industrial <br />Zoning designation. <br />The first question to be considered is whether strict enforcement of the <br />ordinance would result in an unnecessary hardship resulting from unusual <br />property conditions or configuration._In staffs opinion, the 125 foot property <br />width is narrow for an industrially zoned parcel. The narrowness becomes <br />more apparent when the 30 foot B.I. side setbacks are considered. These <br />setbacks are intended to serve a dual purpose, both of which are related to <br />the purpose and intent behind the creation of the B.I. district. <br />B.I. Zones are typically sited in high profile areas. They are intended to serve <br />as a buffer between higher intensity industrial activities and areas such as <br />residential districts, or residential neighborhoods. Setbacks are one of the <br />means (by creating more open, lower density development) by which buffering <br />is achieved. The second purpose is related to typical B.I. business activities. <br />_ ~ Most B.I. activities are in some way trucking related. The 30 foot side <br />setbacks are intended to insure room for adequate truck maneuvering. <br />As noted, 125 feet of property width is somewhat narrow by industrial <br />standards. Further, in order to provide adequate storm water drainage for the <br />site, drainage swales are to be cut down each side property line. If the <br />building were centered on the property, space available for truck maneuvering <br />would be extremely limited. While the side setbacks would provide an <br />adequate access aisle, there would be very little room for backing or <br />maneuvering. <br />Offsetting the building in the manner proposed will provide an adequate aisle <br />down the north side of the property. It should also provide adequate area for <br />backing and turning at the rear portion of the building. <br />Strict conformance with ordinance requirements would; due to narrowness of <br />the property, make it difficult to conduct a Permitted Business Industrial <br />activity. Secondly, as illustrated on Exhibit B, adjacent tracts on both sides <br />are developed and under separate ownership. <br />