My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
04-18-1996 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1996
>
04-18-1996 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
4/18/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Page 2 of 3 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Minutes of April 18, 1996 <br />• Granting this appeal would be contrary to the best interest of the <br />community. . <br />• Granting this appeal would be clearly contrary to the spirit and intent of <br />the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. <br />• Due.to the availability and necessity of the Fourth Street right-of-way <br />for driveway access, denying ~ this appeal will not restrict or prevent the <br />use and development of this property for the type of business being <br />proposed. <br />Staff s recommendation to the Board was to deny the appeal. <br />Vice Chairman Grant questioned staff's logic that allowing two drives ~ on Fairmont <br />Parkway would create a traffic conflict. Mr. Grant contended that two drives would <br />alleviate anticipated traffic conflicts. After considerable discussion, the Board heard <br />from the applicant. <br />A. PROPONENTS <br />Vice Chairman Grant swore in the applicant, Rudy Hikary. Mr. <br />Hikary told the Board he was expecting ~ approximately 600-800 <br />customers per day and needed to make sure cars would be able to come <br />and go from his store without delay. He did not believe he would be <br />granted a special privilege, since McDonald's has a similar drive setup <br />that seems to be working well. He noted that the property adjacent to <br />his has no drives on Fairmont Parkway and questioned why the City <br />could not include that footage when calculating spacing for his drives. <br />B. OPPONENTS <br />There were none. <br />A motion was made by Bob Capen to deny Appeal of the Enforcement Officer's <br />Decision #A96-002. The motion was seconded by Jim Zoller. The motion passed <br />with Bob Capen, Jim Zoller, and Willie Walker voting to deny the appeal and Ruben <br />Salinas voting in favor of the appeal. <br />IV. CONSIDER SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST #SE96-001, WffiCH HAS BEEN <br />REQUESTED FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 116 NORTH 16TH <br />STREET. APPLICANT IS SEEKING AN EXCEPTION TO THE SIDE AND <br />REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IlVIPOSED~ BY THE CITY OF LA <br />PORTE'S ZONING ORDINANCE. <br />Mr. Rankin presented staff's report for Special Exception Request #SE96-001. <br />Mr. Rankin noted that the special exception was requested by Pfeiffer & Son, Inc. , <br />for the property located at 116 N. 16th Street. He informed the Board that the <br />applicant proposed construction of a shop/warehouse with a front setback of 10 feet <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.