My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
04-18-1996 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1996
>
04-18-1996 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
4/18/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Staff Report May 23, 1996 <br />Appeal of the Enforcement .Officer's Decision #A96-004 <br />Requested BX: <br />Paul D. Covington, property owner <br />Requested For: <br />The request is for the 9300 Block of Montgomery Lane, which is further described as Lot 42; <br />Block 2; Spenwick Place, 5.1. . <br />~• <br />(RI) Low Density Residential <br />Pose of Request• <br />The applicant is appealing the decision of the Enforcing Officer to deny a building permit for <br />construction of a fenced pazking lot for the pazking of cars in aLow-Density (R-1) Zone. The <br />permit was denied under the provisions of Sect. 5-600, Table A, which does not show outdoor <br />storage as a listed, allowable use in a residential zone. <br />Background• <br />The property in question is currently a vacant lot located in a Residential Single Family Zone <br />(Rl). The Applicants Property is located in a General Commercial Zone. The Applicant seeks <br />to extend his property from GC along Spencer Highway south into a Residential District. <br />Analysis: <br />Zoning Ordinance Section 11-604 establishes the conditions under which the Boazd may grant <br />an appeal. The guidelines aze as follows: <br />• That there is a reasonable difference of interpretation as to the specific intent <br />of the zoning regulations or zoning map, provided the interpretation of the <br />enforcement officer is a reasonable presumption and the zoning ordinance is <br />unreasonable. <br />• That the resulting interpretation will not grant a special privilege to one <br />property inconsistent with other properties or uses similarly situated. <br />• The decision of the Board must be in the best interest of the community and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.