Laserfiche WebLink
~ • <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />December 5, .1996 <br />Variance Request V96-003 <br />A) The total building footage does not exceed 48,000 square feet. <br />('This new building addition will increase the total squaze footage <br />for the building to 45,400.) <br />B) The building has a maximum height of 55 feet. ('The proposed <br />building is approximately 25 feet in height.) <br />C) The rear and side setbacks of three to ten feet would require a one <br />hour rated wall with limited openings (10%) to provide an <br />adequate fire resistance rating. <br />Analysis: Zoning Ordinance Section 7-600, Table B establishes setback and lot coverage <br />requirements for facilities located in HI zones. This table specifies the following <br />building setbacks: Side, 30 feet; Reaz, 50 feet. The table also caps lot coverage <br />at a maximum of 30%. It should be noted that lot coverage is essentially based <br />on roofed structures. Driveways and open pazking/staging azeas aze not included <br />in lot coverage calculations. <br />As proposed, the building would require a setback variance of 45 feet at the rear <br />and 25 feet to the side. The front setback is not an issue for this building. <br />Additionally, the complex if developed as proposed, will require lot coverage <br />vaziance of 21 %. (See Exhibit A) <br />In August, 1992, Laurel Industries was granted Vaziance #V92-003. The <br />variance covered an office building and a warehouse. The vaziance granted for <br />the office building was for a front setback of 30 feet 6 inches and side setback of <br />5 .feet while the warehouse was given a reduced rear and side setback of 5 feet. <br />The addition of these two buildings resulted in a need for an increase in the <br />maximum lot coverage from 30 % to 47 %. Only the office building has been <br />built. The applicant is now proposing a.lazger wazehouse than the one proposed <br />in 1992, with the same 5 foot rear and side setbacks. The maximum lot <br />coverage, as a result, would be 51 % instead of 47 % granted in 1992. <br />Section 11-606 of the Zoning Ordinance defines a variance as "a deviation from <br />the literal provisions of the Zoning Ordinance granted ... when strict conformity <br />to the Zoning Ordinance would cause an unnecessary hardship.... " <br />This Section of the Ordinance empowers the Board to grant variances subject to <br />the following conditions: <br />