Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Board of Adjustm~ <br />Mutates of February 27,1997 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />2. After the bar closed in 1992, Richard's Auto Repair irt>7ized both <br />parking lots and bw~dings for a car sales business and automotive <br />repair shoe. <br />3. In June, 1995, the automotive repair shop was relocated <br />4. On September 24,1992, Richard's Automotive Repair and Used Car <br />Sales was granted Special Exception #SE92-003 to allow the use of <br />the property at 2757 S. Broadway for that business. Ia July, 1995, <br />this same property was issued a Zoning Permit for a small eng~ae <br />repair shop. <br />5. In January, 1997, Br~l and Dorothy Stevens were granted Appeal <br />#A97-002 for the operation of a beauty salon at 2757 Old Hwy. 146. <br />6. In January,1997, atoning Permit was issued to Bill and Dorothy <br />Stevens for a beauty salon known as Studio 7 Hair Care. <br />Mr. Flores explained there were two issues to be deternrined in making a <br />decision on this Appeal. First, was the non-conforming use abandoned for <br />at least 90 consecutive days, and second, did the owner or his representative <br />intend to abandon the non-conforming use during the period of cessation of <br />the use. <br />In conclusion, Mr. Flores noted the current property owners purchased the <br />property in question and it was zoned R-3 (Higkr Density Residential). It <br />housed a tenant that had a Zoning Permit to operate at that location. The <br />tenant remained until Jaauary,1997. The current owners have appeared <br />before the Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, and the Board of <br />Adjustment and in all instances followed proper procedures. They now have <br />Building and Zoning Permits for the use of the property. <br />Staff recommended denial of Appeal #A97-002. <br />Chairrnaa Bernay asked the applicant for his testimonry. Mr. Pomonis stated <br />that the land owner of the nonconforming use had the burden of proving to <br />the Board of Adjustment that the nonconforming use did not cease. He <br />wanted to hear the landowner's testimony prior to his being given. Mr. <br />Pomonis instructed the Chairman to ask the City Attorney who should give <br />first testimonry. Mr. Armstrong's response was that the Board of Adjustment <br />would determrae whose testimony wr71 be heard first. Chairman Benaay <br />again asked the applicant for his testimony. Chairman Bernay swore in Mr. <br />Pomonis. <br />