Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Staff Report JUNE 24,1999 <br />Appeal of Enforcement Officer's Decision #A 99-001 '~, <br />Requested bv: Atlantis Homes, Bill Herrick, Owner <br />Requested for: Elimination of the Residence and Garage Fire Separation <br />Background: In November 1995, by Ordinance #95 2079, the City adopted the 1994 <br />Edition of the Standard Building Code and appendices. Then in October, <br />1997, the City adopted the current Code of Ordinances by Ordinance #97- <br />2198. Section 82-31 of that Code adopted and designated the 1994 Edition <br />of the Standard Building Code and appendices as the building code of the <br />~Y• <br />In accordance with Section 411.2.6 of the city's building code, the separation <br />between an automobile parking garage and other occupancies is required. <br />However, an option to this requirement is granted for Group R3 buildings <br />(one and two family dwellings) and an attached garage. A copy of this <br />requirement is attached and identified as Exhibit A <br />However, one of the referenced appendices adopted by the city is the CABO <br />One and Two Family Dwelling Code. In this code, Section 309.2 <br />specifically requires the garage to be separated from the residence and its <br />attic area by means of a minimum 'i4-inch gypsum board applied to the <br />garage side. A copy of this requirement is attached and identified as Exhibit <br />B. <br />The exception referenced in the building code is located in Chapter 4, which <br />is identified as "Special Occupancy". This chapter is very broad and <br />includes regulations on residential, commeraal and industrial separations. <br />The One and Two Family Dwelling Code on the other hand is specifically <br />written to deal with residential construction. <br />The city has by department policy and by enforcement of the Dwelling Code <br />regulation required a separation between the residence and an attached <br />garage. This requirement is in place currently and is being uniformly <br />