My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
06-01-2000 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2000
>
06-01-2000 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:09:22 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:09:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
6/1/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.`• M�V V V. V <br />A. Exhibit K is a November 30; 1993 letter from City Chief Building Official Mark Lewis to <br />Kevin Blackwell and his attorney. It states, "..: Section 10-300.10 of the City Zoning Ordinance <br />1501 specifically allows livestock (as an accessory use) to be pastured on properties of an acre <br />or more in size. However, this section also limits livestock concentration to a maximum of two <br />animals per acre. Concentration limits apply to individual pastures." and on page 2 Mr. Lewis <br />states, "In the future, the City must ask that you observe these concentration limits when housing <br />livestock animals on the property in question. Should these concentration limits be violated, the <br />City will issue a Municipal Court citation for violation of Zoning Ordinance requirements." <br />B. Zoning Ordinance 1501, sec. 11-604, Appeals to the Board of Adjustment, states that an appeal <br />to. the Board of Adjustment of a decision of the enforcement officer must be. made within 30 days. <br />C. Kevin Blackwell never appealed Mr. .Lewis'decision to limit the Blackwell's housing of livestock to <br />2 animals per acre. Therefore; Mr. Lewis' decision stands. <br />4. Under -Sec. 106-263(b); the use of outlot 420A has become much more conforming to <br />City Zoning requirements of 2 head per acre after, Kevin,. Blackwell moved.to East <br />Texas approximately 3 years. <br />A. Current Zoning Ordinance 106 section 263(exhibit Q states..."or the nonconforming use or <br />structure may be changed to a use or stricture more conforming to the zoning district in which the <br />nonconforming use or structure is located: For the purposes of this section , the term" more <br />conforming to the zoning district in which the nonconforming use or structure is located" shall <br />mean a less intense use, (per the Standard industrial classification code)..."A nonconforming <br />use or structure so changed shall not thereafter be returned to a nonconforming use or <br />structure., <br />B. The City started a weekly inspection of Outlot 420A in app. January, 2000. Their inspection <br />-proves the numbers of animals have been greatly reduced during that time. I have videos that <br />prove the number of animals on Outlot 420A has been greatly, reduced since Kevin Blackwell <br />moved to East Texas app. 3 years ago. Greatly reduced means from up to 45 animals per acre <br />from 1990 to 1997 down to 0 to app. 4 animals per acre from 1997 to present. <br />Under Current Zoning Ordinance 106, section 266, The only factor in deciding whether to extend .the <br />useful life of a nonconforming use is whether an extension is necessary for the property owner to recoup <br />the current remaining useful investment In the use made prior to the effective date of this zoning <br />ordinance. <br />Kevin Blackwell's investment in the horse stables and feed lot amounted to a pole barn, and_fencing. If <br />he has rented 10 to 15 horse stables over the past 20 years at app. $50 each, he has paid for the bam <br />and fencing many times over and therefore his nonconforming use permit should. be revoked <br />immediately. <br />Just one of. these 4 facts is enough justify revoking Kevin Blackwell's <br />nonconforming use permit. Together they are a mountain of evidence that <br />Kevin Blackwell's nonconforming use permit should be immediately revoked. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.