My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
01-24-2002 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2002
>
01-24-2002 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:10:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/24/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Board of Adjustmart • • <br />_ 1N'inutes of January 24, 2002 <br />Page 2 <br />Public Hearing notification was mailed to eight (8) property owners. The City received one <br />(1) response in favor and none were received in opposition. Staff polled five surrounding <br />cities to determine if their zoning regulations had provisions for signs with flashing ar <br />moving lights. Of the five cities polled, only one allowed such use, with restrictions. <br />A. PROPONENTS <br />Chairperson Grant swore in Gilbert Russell Ybarra, owner of Gringo's Mexican <br />Kitchen. Mr. Ybarra stated he had discussions with the sales representative far <br />"State Sign", regarding the possibility of replacing his existing sign with a Las Vegas <br />style sign with flashing lights. The sign representativ a told him that type of sign <br />would be allowed in LaPorte. Mr. Ybarra pointed out the ardinance, as presented, <br />does not say a sign cannot move, flash,. or rotate, rather it says a sign cannot move, <br />flash, ar rotate in such a manner as to be confused with t raffic control signals ar <br />emergency vehicle signals. Mr~Ybarrr contacted the publisher of the Bayshore Srm <br />to gain another perspective regarding the intent of the ordinance. The publisher <br />wrote an article about the sign, which basically stated the same. Mr. Ybarra added <br />that enforcement of flashing signs appears to be selective, since they can be found in <br />other locations in the City, such as "Covington's" and "Video Viewer". <br />Chairperson Grant swore in Harold Mabry, with State Sign Corporation. Mr. Mob ry <br />resides at 11230 N. Ave. "P". He has worked for State Sign Corporation far 45 <br />years. Mr. Ybarra has been his customer for 5 -6 years. Mr. Ybarra spoke wi$r him <br />about. the pos~bility of purchasing a sign with moving lights for his La Porte <br />restaurant. Mr: Mabry visited City Hall to find out whether. or not Mr. Ybarra's sig~r <br />request was acceptable to the City. The gentleman he spoke with informed him <br />there would be no problem obtaining permits for the two signs with moving ligkrts. <br />Mr. Mabry went back to Mr. Ybarra and told him about his conversation wig the <br />~'• <br />Chairperson Grant swore in Al Flores, attorney for Mr. Ybarra. Mr. Flores has an <br />office at 3401 Louisiana, Houston. Mr. Flores understands the intent of the <br />ordinance is to restrict a sign from containing words such as, "caution, danger, <br />detour, etc... " so as not to cause confusion with traffic related devices. He stated <br />that the diagram describing the sign in question indicates a height of 18' 4". Due to <br />the type, height, and direction of this sign, it should,not apply to the ordinance. He <br />stated that both sign diagrams were submitted on August 13 `~. Each diagram was a <br />singe page with a singe font size with the word "traveling" noted on one of the <br />diagrams. Mr. Flares added that the Ybarra's have gone through great time and <br />expense on this matter and there was a detrimental reliance on the City's agent who <br />said the signs could be used. <br />Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong asked if Mr. Ybarra's testimonywas that the <br />sign would not have gone up if the City had not okayed it, ar was it a question of the <br />ordinance. Mr. Flores replied one depends on the other. He added, Mr. Yban: a and <br />the ~ sign company representative plainly read the ordinance and determined that due <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.