My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-24-2002 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2002
>
10-24-2002 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:10:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/24/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Report November 20, 2002 <br />Variance Request #V02-002 <br />Requested bv: Mr. William Helm representing First National Bank of Bellaire. <br />Requested for: Waiver from the City's 180-unit maximum for multi-family complexes <br />Location: ~ ~ Luella at Fairmont Pazkway - 22.355 acres in the William M: Jones <br />. ~ Survey, Abstract No. 402, Harris County ' <br />Zoning: High Density Residential 3 (R 3) 20.355 acres and <br />General Commercial (GC) 2 acres . <br />Background: The project is proposed on approximately 20 acres zoned R-3. The boundaries of the <br />property are. Luella on the west, Venture Lane on the north, Willow Spring Gully on the <br />. east, and on Fairmont Parkway on the south. (See Exhibit A.) Two hundred units aze <br />proposed~giving the project a density of ten (10) units per acre. <br />On June 2002, Mr. Helm inquired about the development and zoning regulations for <br />multi-family units. Staff informed Mr. Helm that City Council placed a moratorium on <br />the construction of mid to high density residential development to create new regulations. <br />On October 14, 2002, Council adopted Ordinance 1501-XX. Among the new regulations <br />established was a 180-unit maximum on all multi-family. complexes. This change is <br />found in Section 106-333 Table B. (See Exhibit B) <br />On October 18, 2002, Mr. Helm met with Staff and presented a conceptual rendering of <br />the proposed 200-unit development. (See Exhibit C.) This proposed build-out exceeds <br />the City's 180-unit maximum. ~ . <br />Citing Section 106-192 B (2) b, the applicant is seeking a variance from the 180-unit <br />maximum. As an attachment to his application, Mr. Helm notes several major hardships <br />that affect the property. First, "a lot of the land is in flood zone AE and is unusable; a <br />higher density is needed in the area that is useable." The applicanrt also noted that the <br />requirement that the 3-story buildings be built away from the adjacent residential <br />subdivision poises another hazdship. To keep the density that the development needs, the <br />applicant believes he must build 20 additional units. This will give the complex <br />approximately 10.4 units per acre, which is below the required 14 units. Mr. Helm also <br />noted that securing a "strong" financial institution could be .difficult which could <br />ultimately affect the maintenance of the property. Finally, the increase in the number of <br />units will allow a better unit mix. <br />Analysis: Section 106-192 B (1), in the Code of Ordinances, defines a variance as deviation from <br />the literal provisions of the chapter which is granted by the Board when strict conformity <br />to the chapter. would cause an unnecessary hardship because of the circumstances <br />. unique to the property on which the variance is granteaC <br />Except as otherwise prohibited the board is empowered to authorize a variance from a <br />requirement when the board finds that all of the following~conditions have been met. ~ . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.