My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
11-20-2002 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2002
>
11-20-2002 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:08:04 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:10:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
11/20/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Report March 27, 2003 <br />Variance Request #V03-001 <br />Requested by: Mr. William Helm representing First National Bank of Bellaire. <br />Requested for: Waiver from the City's $1 million bond requirement and provide a Reserve Fund in lieu <br />of the requirement. <br />Location: Luella at Fairmont Parkway — 22.355 acres in the William M. Jones <br />Survey, Abstract No. 402, Harris County <br />Zoning: 20.355 acres High Density Residential 3 (R-3) <br />Background: The project is proposed on approximately 20 acres zoned R 3. The boundaries of the <br />property are Luella on the west, Venture Lane on the north, Willow Spring Gully on the <br />east, and on Fairmont Parkway on the south. (See Exhibit A.) Approximately 180 units <br />are proposed giving the project a density of nine (9) units per acre. <br />On June 2002, Mr. Helm inquired about the development and zoning regulations for <br />multi -family units. Staff informed Mr. Helm that City Council placed a moratorium on <br />the construction of mid to high density residential development to create new regulations. <br />On October 14, 2002, Council adopted Ordinance 1501-XX. Among the new regulations <br />established was a 180-unit maximum on all multi -family complexes. On October 18, <br />2002, Mr. Helm presented Staff with a plan that exceeded the 180-unit limit. On <br />November 20, 2002, Mr. Helm asked the Board for a variance. His request was denied. <br />During this time, Mr. Helm also stated that he could not secure a $1 million bond and/or <br />irrevocable letter of credit as required for new multi -family developments over 100 units. <br />(See requirements in Exhibit E.) On March 6, 2003, the applicant filed a request for <br />variance. Citing Section 106-192 B (2) b, he is seeking relief from the requirements <br />found in Section 106-150. <br />As an attachment to his application, Mr. Helm notes several major hardships that affect <br />the property. First, "no bonding company, insurance company or bank will issue such a <br />bond." In lieu of the bond/irrevocable letter of credit, the applicant indicates that the <br />stipulations found in a HUD 221(d) 4 loan require that the borrower maintain a Reserve <br />Replacement account for the loan's life. The applicant will be required annual deposits of <br />$45, 000 (approximately $250 per unit). After 40 years, the deposits will equal $1.8 <br />million. <br />Analysis: Section 106-192 B (1), in the Code of Ordinances, defines a variance as a deviation from <br />the literal provisions of the chapter which is granted by the Board when strict conformity <br />to the chapter would cause an unnecessary hardship because of the circumstances <br />unique to the property on which the variance is granted <br />Except as otherwise prohibited the board is empowered to authorize a variance from a <br />requirement when the board finds that all of the following conditions have been met. <br />:ZM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.