My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
04-24-2003 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2003
>
04-24-2003 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:10:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
4/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Staff Report May 22, 2003 <br />Special Exception Request #SE03-002 <br />Reauested bv: Buford Lloyd Crowell, Jr., property owner <br />Reauested for: Lots 57 & 58; Block 24; Bayfront to La Porte Addition <br />Location: 706 S. Blackwell <br />Zoning: Low Density Residential (R-1) <br />Bac round: The age of the single family dwelling in question is unknown; however, <br />based on the 1980 city aerial map the home existed at that time. $ee Exhibit <br />A. The applicant is unable to provide a property survey but based on an <br />"exposed" front property corner pin, the applicant and staff both feel the <br />house is located approximately twenty-three feet (23') back from the front <br />property line. Since the front yard setback does not comply with the existing <br />twenty-five foot (25') front yard setback established by the city's zoning <br />regulations, the house is considered apre-existing, non-conforming structure. <br />Recently a front porch addition was built without the authorization of the <br />city and is located only sixteen feet (16') back from the front property line. <br />The porch addition increases the amount of nonconformity for the property. <br />The applicant has. stated that a smaller porch did existed at one time; <br />however, the aerial map does not reflect this and he has been unable to locate <br />an old survey or photographs to substantiate this for stafl=. <br />The applicant wishes to keep the porch in place by obtaining a city building <br />permit; however, staff is unable to issue a permit based on the conflict with <br />the zoning regulations. <br />To address this issue, the applicant has chosen to submit a Special Exception <br />request asking for a deviation from the front yard requirement. <br />Analysis: The Code of Ordinances defines a special exception as a specified <br />enumerated deviation from zoning regulations. The Board is empowered to <br />grant a special exception when it finds the following: ~ . <br />• Granting the exception will not adversely affect the value, or use of <br />neighboring property. <br />• Granting the exception will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.