My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-28-2003 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2003
>
08-28-2003 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:11:00 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:10:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/28/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />James W. Liles, Sr. Variance Request <br />Type of Relief being Sought: <br />Two issues have to be considered. <br />#1 - Sect. 106-262(g) allows a structure that is existing <br />and is nonconforming to.be enlarged if the degree of <br />nonconformity is not increased. The proposed addition -.to <br />the garage would not increase the degree of nonconformity. <br />#2 - Sect. 106�471(e)(1) identifies that accessory buildings, <br />carports, garages for single-family dwellings shall not occupy <br />more than 25%'of the rear yard nor exceed 1,000 square feet of <br />floor area. <br />The addition would make the overall garage 602 square feet in <br />size. This is clearly less than the 1,000 square feet. However, <br />based on the location of the existing home, my rear yard is only <br />2,146 square feet in size. Using 25% of this area would prevent <br />me from adding on. -.anything larger -than 36.5 square feet. <br />My proposed 61X17'or 102 square feet addition is approximately <br />28% of the rear yard area. <br />Grounds for the Request: <br />The addition._.to the rear of the garage would meet the required <br />3' setback from the property line. The addition would not be <br />located within the standard 10' side setback area off of the <br />C Street right-of-way. The shape of the house and it's existing <br />location results in a small backyard area. <br />The proposed 6' X 17' (102 Sq. Ft.) addition.would cover 28% of <br />the rear yard in lieu of. the standard 25% area. I'do not believe <br />the addition would result in a problem for neighboring property <br />owners and the addition is well away from the street right-of-way. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.