Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />July 28, 2005 <br />#Y05-003 <br />Page 2 of3 <br /> <br />.:. That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br /> <br />.:. That literal enforcement of the chapter will result in unnecessary hardship because of <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, topography or other extraordinary or <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the specific piece of property in question. <br />"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property itself as <br />distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, financial considerations or <br />caprice, and the hardship must not result from the applicant or property owner's own <br />actions; and <br /> <br />.:. That by granting the variance, the spirit of the chapter will be observed. <br /> <br />In determining if granting the applicant's request would be contrary to the public interest, <br />Staff recognizes that the development of the property with high fence location in <br />particular may not create a problem with adjoining properties. Safety is cited as a primary <br />issue since the adjacent street conveys heavy vehicular traffic. <br /> <br />A survey of surrounding properties shows that this non-compliance with the ordinance is <br />common to some other residences in the vicinity. The ordinance states that fences <br />erected along property line in common with residential properties shall be subject to the <br />provisions described in residential district fences requirement. In viewing the specific <br />grounds for granting a variance, Staff noted that the reason, as for security and safety, is <br />legitimate. Because of the nature and location of the property, we do not find, however, <br />" . . . unnecessary hardships due to an exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape <br />topography, or other extraordinary or exceptional physical situation unique to the <br />property in question." <br /> <br />The applicant believes that a relief on the fence height will improve the image of an area <br />and will match with an existing fence on the property. In addition, it will not have an <br />adverse impact on the adjacent properties. In fact, the City's Little Cedar Bayou Park will <br />be benefited as far as security is concerned. A memo from the City's Parks and <br />Recreation Department is attached in this regard. The applicant requests that the Board <br />recognize this as a positive step. <br /> <br />The ZBOA's final consideration is whether granting of this request, observes the spirit of <br />the ordinance. <br /> <br />Conclusion: <br /> <br />Variance Request #V05-003, which seeks a variance for allowing 8' high wood fence <br />around an entire property, is contrary to Section 106-791 thru 106-793 of the City of La <br />Porte's Code of Ordinances. In addition to the overall impact of a fence along Old <br />Highway 146 (South Broadway), the parameters for the requested variance, however, in <br />staff s opinion, appear to meet the provisions established by Section 106-192 Variances. <br />