Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />April 27, 2006 <br />#V 06-002 <br />Page 2 of3 <br /> <br />Analvsis: <br /> <br />Section 1 06-1 92(b )( 1), in the Code of Ordinances, defmes a variance as a deviation from <br />the literal provisions of the chapter which is granted by the Board when strict conformity <br />to the chapter would cause an unnecessary hardship because of the circumstances <br />unique to the property on which the variance is granted <br /> <br />Except as otherwise prohibited, the board is empowered to authorize a variance from a <br />requirement when the board finds that all of the following conditions have been met. <br /> <br />.:. That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br /> <br />.:. That literal enforcement of the chapter will result in unnecessary hardship because of <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, topography or other extraordinary or <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the specific piece of property in question. <br />"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property itself <br />as distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, financial considerations or <br />caprice, and the hardship must not result from the applicant or property owner's own <br />actions; and <br /> <br />.:. That by granting the variance, the spirit of the chapter will be observed <br /> <br />The Board is charged with determining if the applicant's variance request to above <br />sections of the ordinance is reasonable and whether all of the above conditions were met. <br /> <br />To determine if granting the applicant's request would be contrary to the general public, <br />it should be noted that the home and garage shall be consistent in design and that the <br />development of the property may not create a problem with adjoining properties. <br />Adjoining properties are also single-family residential. <br /> <br />When looking at the next test, the variance may still observe the spirit of the law, if one <br />considers the spirit is to ensure uniformity and property maintenance throughout the City. <br />There is already some degree of property irregularities at various sites in this <br />neighborhood; therefore, it does not appear that the applicant's request will create a <br />negative impact to the property or the surrounding area. <br /> <br />The final test is the most difficult and involves unnecessary hardship. Staff does not find <br />the applicant's request meets the physical hardship test, as there is nothing unique about <br />his property. <br /> <br />Conclusion: <br /> <br />Variance Request #V06-002 seeks relief for proposed two story detached garage. The <br />circumstance, however, for the requested variance needs to be re-evaluated in that the <br />request is not due to physical hardship imposed by the uniqueness of the property in <br />question. In addition, the property needs to be replatted as one lot with one HCAD <br />account to declare the accessory use in a side yard for the principal structure. <br />