Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Minutes of February 28, 2008 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />where the proposed sign was to be located. Mr. Rothfelder presented Board Members <br />with copies of a letter he had written in support of the Appeal. He also provided copies of <br />photos of the proposed sign location, as well as photos of an existing sign. <br /> <br />Mr. Rothfelder's interpretation of Code of Ordinances Section 106-875 (H) is that <br />billboards cannot be located on the same side of the street within 1000' of each other. <br />He noted that City regulations do not say to measure the distance in a radial fashion, nor <br />do they say to measure on the same side of the street. He referred to regulations <br />imposed by the Texas Department of Transportation on spacing of signs in Texas <br />Administrative Code Title 43, 21.153, which refers to distance being measured between <br />signs on the same side of the roadway, and not in a radial fashion. Mr. Rothfelder <br />informed the Board that on July 1, 1999, the City of La Porte granted SignAd a permit for <br />another billboard located on the west side of Highway 146 north of West Barbour'S Cut <br />Blvd. A copy of the permit was included with his materials. Across the street, within 590' <br />from the permitted billboard, was an existing billboard, but the permit was issued because <br />it was further than 1000' from the nearest billboard on the same side of the highway. Mr. <br />Rothfelder stated the proposed billboard site is suitable for outdoor advertising. <br /> <br />Chairman Maltsberger swore in Mark Grimes, with SignAd, 2400 S. Voss, Houston, <br />Texas. In response to a question from the Board, Mr. Grimes said that placement of the <br />sign at the proposed location would allow for the remainder of the property to be <br />developed. <br /> <br />Mr. Malik responded to points made by Mr. Rothfelder: <br /> <br />Section 106-875 (H) does not distinguish between signs located on the same side of the <br />street and across the street. It simply states that signs shall be spaced in intervals of not <br />less than 1000'. <br /> <br />The City is not bound by the particular section of 43 Texas Administrative Code <br />referenced by SignAd. Another part of 43 Texas Administrative Code, Section 21.151 <br />specifically allows a municipality to regulate the size, lighting, and spacing requirements <br />of signs and to enact regulations that are more restrictive than the general rules in 43 <br />Texas Administrative Code. <br /> <br />It is irrelevant that the City approved a permit under similar circumstances in the past. <br />The Board can only evaluate the appeal based on the three criteria outlined in the law <br />and referenced in the staff report. <br /> <br />Mr. Rothfelder addressed staffs response in that the City did not make a mistake in <br />1999, rather it correctly interpreted its regulations and established a precedence. Mr. <br />Rothfelder believes it was Council's intent that spacing intervals be measured on the <br />same side of the highway. One should not compare spacing requirements for <br />apartments with spacing requirements for billboards. <br /> <br />Mr. Rothfelder requested the Board reverse the decision of the Enforcement Officer by <br />granting the Appeal. <br /> <br />c. OPPONENTS <br /> <br />There was no opposition presented. <br /> <br />Motion by Bob Capen to deny Appeal #A08-001 and to uphold the Enforcement Officer's decision <br />to deny a permit to SignAd, Ltd. to erect an off premises advertising sign at 1911 W. Main Street. <br />Second by Chester Pool. The motion carried. <br />